Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20203669›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2010

NMR-based metabolomic analysis of plants.

Hye Kyong Kim, Young Hae Choi, Robert Verpoorte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 258 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
258citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

258 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synergistic lipase inhibition by Garcinia parvifolia metabolites: aMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Metabolites · 2026
    Article
  4. Allelochemical Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

198 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hye Kyong KimDivision of Pharmacognosy, Section Metabolomics, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Young Hae Choi
Robert Verpoorte

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics has many applications in plant science. Metabolomics can be used in functional genomics and to differentiate plants from different origin, or after different treatments. In this protocol, the following steps of plant metabolomics using NMR spectroscopy are described: sample preparation (freeze drying followed by extraction by ultrasonication with 1:1 CD(3)OD:KH(2)PO(4) buffer in D(2)O), NMR analysis (standard (1)H, J-resolved, (1)H-(1)H correlation spectroscopy (COSY) and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC)) and chemometric methods. The main advantage of NMR metabolomic analysis is the possibility of identifying metabolites by comparing NMR data with references or by structure elucidation using two-dimensional NMR. This protocol is particularly suited for the analysis of secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds (usually abundant in plants), and for primary metabolites (e.g., sugars and amino acids). This procedure is rapid; it takes not more than 30 min for sample preparation (multiple parallel) and a further 10 min for NMR spectrum acquisition.

Indexed as

Freeze DryingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsMolecular StructureMultivariate AnalysisPlants

Identifiers

PMID20203669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.