Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20203474›Full record

ReviewCytogenetic and genome research2009

Variability in sex-determining mechanisms influences genome complexity in reptilia.

D E Janes, C L Organ, S V Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytogenetic and genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D E JanesDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. djanes@oeb.harvard.edu
C L Organ
S V Edwards

Funding

Evolution of BMP Genes 2 and 4 in ArcosaursF32GM075490 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI ORGAN, CHRIS · 2005 to 2007
$143k
Evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes in ReptiliaF32GM072494 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI JANES, DANIEL E · 2005 to 2007
$137k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM072494NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM075490NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM072494NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM075490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we describe the history of amniote sex determination as a classic example of Darwinian evolution. We suggest that evolutionary changes in sex determination provide a foundation for understanding important aspects of chromosome and genome organization that otherwise appear haphazard in their origins and contents. Species with genotypic sex determination often possess heteromorphic sex chromosomes, whereas species with environmental sex determination lack them. Through a series of mutations followed by selection at key genes, sex-determining mechanisms have turned over many times throughout the amniote lineage. As a consequence, amniote genomes have undergone gains or losses of sex chromosomes. We review the genomic and ecological contexts in which either temperature-dependent or genotypic sex determination has evolved. Once genotypic sex determination emerges in a lineage, viviparity and heteromorphic sex chromosomes become more likely to evolve. For example, in extinct marine reptiles, genotypic sex determination apparently led to viviparity, which in turn facilitated their pelagic radiation. Sex chromosomes comprise genome regions that differ from autosomes in recombination rate, mutation rate, levels of polymorphism, and the presence of sex-determining and sexually antagonistic genes. In short, many aspects of amniote genome complexity, life history, and adaptive radiation appear contingent on evolutionary changes in sex-determining mechanisms.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenomeSex Determination ProcessesAnimalsFemaleMaleReptiles

Identifiers

PMID20203474
PMCPMC2872680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.