Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20203316›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2010

Biological therapies for cardiac arrhythmias: can genes and cells replace drugs and devices?

Hee Cheol Cho, Eduardo Marbán

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hee Cheol ChoCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. chohc@cshs.org
Eduardo Marbán
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Molecular determinants of the cardiac pacemaker automaticityR01HL111646 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHO, HEE CHEOL · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac rhythm disorders reflect failures of impulse generation and/or conduction. With the exception of ablation methods that yield selective endocardial destruction, present therapies are nonspecific and/or palliative. Progress in understanding the underlying biology opens up prospects for new alternatives. This article reviews the present state of the art in gene- and cell-based therapies to correct cardiac rhythm disturbances. We begin with the rationale for such approaches, briefly discuss efforts to address aspects of tachyarrhythmia, and review advances in creating a biological pacemaker to cure bradyarrhythmia. Insights gained bring the field closer to a paradigm shift away from devices and drugs, and toward biologics, in the treatment of rhythm disorders.

Indexed as

Cell TransplantationGenetic TherapyAction PotentialsAnimalsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsArrhythmias, CardiacBiological ClocksElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia Agents

Identifiers

PMID20203316
PMCPMC8527570
OpenAlexW2068526962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.