Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20203220›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2010

Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma.

Aaron M Gruver, Ziad Peerwani, Raymond R Tubbs

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron M GruverDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Ziad Peerwani
Raymond R Tubbs
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

Correlative Chromogenic Gene and Protein assessmentR43CA111182 · NCI · NANOPROBES, INC. · PI POWELL, RICHARD DENIS · 2004 to 2004
$175k
CHROMOGENIC HER-2/NEU GENE AMPLIFICATION ASSAYR41CA083618 · NCI · NANOPROBES, INC. · PI POWELL, RICHARD DENIS · 2000 to 2000
$128k
NON-RADIOACTIVE SOUTHERN BLOTTING DETECTION SYSTEMR43CA084875 · NCI · NANOPROBES, INC. · PI POWELL, RICHARD DENIS · 2000 to 2000
$116k
Enzymatic Metallography for Biological DetectionR43GM064257 · NIGMS · NANOPROBES, INC. · PI POWELL, RICHARD DENIS · 2001 to 2001
$106k
NCI NIH HHS 1R41CA83618-01NCI NIH HHS 1R41CA83618-02NCI NIH HHS 1R43 CA111182-01NCI NIH HHS 1R43CA84875-01NCI NIH HHS R41 CA083618NCI NIH HHS R43 CA111182NIGMS NIH HHS 1R43GM0628250-01NIGMS NIH HHS 1R43GM64257-01NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM064257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinomas has become critical in determining response to the humanised monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. The current joint College of American Pathologists and the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for the evaluation of HER2 status in breast carcinoma involve testing by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). However, neither of these modalities is without limitations. Novel bright field in situ hybridisation techniques continue to provide viable alternatives to FISH testing. While these techniques are not limited to evaluation of the HER2 gene, the extensive number of studies comparing bright field in situ techniques with other methods of assessing HER2 status allow a robust evaluation of this approach. Analysis of the literature demonstrates that, when used to assess HER2 gene status, bright field in situ hybridisation demonstrates excellent concordance with FISH results. The average percentage agreement in an informal analysis of studies comparing HER2 amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation with FISH was 96% (SD 4%); kappa coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 1.0. Although a much smaller number of studies are available for review, similar levels of concordance have been reported in studies comparing HER2 amplification by methods employing metallography (silver in situ hybridisation) with FISH. A summary of the advancements in bright field in situ hybridisation, with focus on those techniques with clinical applications of interest to the practicing pathologist, is presented.

Indexed as

Genes, erbB-2Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIn Situ HybridizationIn Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID20203220
PMCPMC2921277
OpenAlexW2127482447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.