ReviewThe oncologist2010
Predicting response to treatment in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas: combining clinical, imaging, and molecular biomarkers.
Review in The oncologist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- BAK is a predictive and prognostic biomarker for the therapeutic effect of docetaxel treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016Trial
- Digital pathology-based artificial intelligence model to predict microsatellite instability in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- PATHOLOGIC COMPLETE RESPONSE (YPT0 YPN0) AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY NEOADJUVANT FOLLOWED BY ESOPHAGECTOMY IN THE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2018Article
- Approaches and genetic determinants in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- TAK1-regulated expression of BIRC3 predicts resistance to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2015Review
- Snail1 correlates with patient outcomes in E-cadherin-preserved gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2014Article
- Article
- Prognostic importance and therapeutic implications of PAK1, a drugable protein kinase, in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is rapidly rising, and even in early-stage locoregional confined disease the 5-year survival rate rarely exceeds 25%-35%. Randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated a benefit with neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy and with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the optimal approach in individual patients is not clear and remains controversial. A consistent finding is that patients who have a histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy are more likely to receive a survival benefit. These clinical data provide a strong argument for the urgent development of methods to predict histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapies for GEJ adenocarcinoma. Published data demonstrate that clinicopathological features (tumor location), imaging (fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography "metabolic response"), and tissue/molecular biomarkers may all have a predictive value for neoadjuvant therapies. However, it is uncertain from published data whether or not they will be useful for clinical decision making in individual patients. Existing candidate biomarkers need to be properly qualified and validated and novel biomarkers are required; and an optimal approach should involve the combination and integration of clinical, imaging, and molecular biomarkers. This review presents the evidence base and discusses novel experimental approaches for the combination of biomarker modalities to allow optimization of an individualized treatment approach in GEJ adenocarcinoma patients that may be relevant to other tumor types as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.