Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20202892›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2010

Expanding the range of 'druggable' targets with natural product-based libraries: an academic perspective.

Renato A Bauer, Jacqueline M Wurst, Derek S Tan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Combination of multicomponent KABeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Selective Functionalization of C(spAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2018
    Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renato A BauerTri-Institutional Training Program in Chemical Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 422, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Jacqueline M Wurst
Derek S Tan

Funding

CANCER PHARMACOLOGYT32CA062948 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LORRAINE J GUDAS · 1994 to 2026
$12.1M
Diversity-Oriented Synthesis of Natural Product-based Libraries for the MLSMRP41GM076267 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI TAN, DEREK S · 2005 to 2012
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA062948NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM076267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing drugs address a relatively narrow range of biological targets. As a result, libraries of drug-like molecules have proven ineffective against a variety of challenging targets, such as protein-protein interactions, nucleic acid complexes, and antibacterial modalities. In contrast, natural products are known to be effective at modulating such targets, and new libraries are being developed based on underrepresented scaffolds and regions of chemical space associated with natural products. This has led to several recent successes in identifying new chemical probes that address these challenging targets.

Indexed as

Small Molecule LibrariesAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansProtein Interaction MappingDNA-Binding ProteinsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID20202892
PMCPMC2878877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.