ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2010
Chikungunya virus infection during pregnancy, Reunion, France, 2006.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical outcomes of chikungunya across age groups: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Mother-to-child transmission of Chikungunya virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Pooled it
- The neurological complications of chikungunya virus: A systematic review.Reviews in medical virology · 2018Pooled it
- A randomized, double-blinded Phase 3 study to demonstrate lot-to-lot consistency and to confirm immunogenicity and safety of the live-attenuated chikungunya virus vaccine candidate VLA1553 in healthy adults†.Journal of travel medicine · 2024Trial
- Comparing Adverse Health Outcomes in Infants Born to Women Monoinfected with Zika Virus or Infected with Both Zika and Chikungunya Viruses during Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study in Pernambuco, Brazil (2015-2017).The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of children perinatally infected with chikungunya: the CHIK13+ matched cohort study on Reunion Island.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- In-utero exposure to chikungunya and child morbimortality: a population-based study using linked routine data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Maternal-Fetal Implications of Chikungunya Virus Infection: An Updated Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Perinatal outcomes of symptomatic chikungunya, dengue and Zika infection during pregnancy in Brazil: a registry-based cohort study.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Perinatal and Neonatal Chikungunya Virus Transmission: A Case Series.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2024Article
- Detection of Chikungunya Virus RNA in Oral Fluid and Urine: An Alternative Approach to Diagnosis?Viruses · 2024Article
- Viral infections and pathogenesis of glaucoma: a comprehensive review.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- High seroprevalence of antibodies against arboviruses in postpartum women in Salvador, Brazil.IJID regions · 2023Article
- Beyond TORCH: A narrative review of the impact of antenatal and perinatal infections on the risk of disability.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Review
- Chikungunya fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Chikungunya: risks for travellers.Journal of travel medicine · 2023Review
- Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mother-to-child transmission of chikungunya virus was reported during the 2005-2006 outbreak on Reunion Island, France. To determine the effects of this virus on pregnancy outcomes, we conducted a study of pregnant women in Reunion in 2006. The study population was composed of 1,400 pregnant women (628 uninfected, 658 infected during pregnancy, 27 infected before pregnancy, and 87 infected on unknown dates). We compared pregnancy outcomes for 655 (628 + 27) women not infected during pregnancy with 658 who were infected during pregnancy. Infection occurred during the first trimester for 15% of the infected women, the second for 59%, and the third for 26%. Only hospital admission during pregnancy differed between infected and uninfected women (40% vs. 29%). Other outcomes (cesarean deliveries, obstetric hemorrhaging, preterm births, stillbirths after 22 weeks, birthweight, congenital malformations, and newborn admissions) were similar. This virus had no observable effect on pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.