ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-port vs multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- A new right groin incision versus McBurney's incision for open appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationTrial
- A Case Report of Acute Appendicitis Complicated by Appendicoliths.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis-Related Mortality Across U.S. Demographics and Regions: A 22-Year CDC WONDER Database Study.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Appendectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Design and Functionality of a Multilumen Thoracic Access Port for Pericardial Access Under Direct Visualization.Journal of medical devices · 2022Article
- Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Clinical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Article
- Comparison of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag techniques: A prospective observational study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2016Article
- Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2015Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2013Article
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for appendicitis in elderly patients.Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology · 2011Article
- Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Comparison of Outcome in a Teaching Hospital, Northeast Nigeria.Journal of the West African College of SurgeonsArticle
- Identification of preoperative risk factors associated with the conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomies.International surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendectomy, being the most common surgical procedure performed in general surgery, is still being performed by both open and laparoscopic methods due to a lack of consensus as to which is the most appropriate method. Because further trials are necessary and few such studies have been performed in developing countries, we decided to evaluate the outcomes of the 2 procedures to share our experience with the international community.
methodsConsecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic (LA) (n=48) and open (n=52) appendectomy (OA) over a period of 3 years were studied. Clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups in relation to operative time, analgesia used, length of hospital stay, return to work, resumption of a regular diet, and postoperative complications.
resultsMean age of patients was 25.8 years in the laparoscopic and 25.5 years in the open group. Patient demographics were similar in both groups (P>0.05). There was significantly less need for analgesia (1.0+/-0.5 in LA and 1.5+/-0.6 doses in OA), a short hospital stay (1.4+/-0.7 in LA and 3.4+/-1.0 days in OA), early return to work (12.6+/-3.3 in LA and 19.1+/-3.1 days in OA), and less time needed to return to a regular diet (20.1+/-2.9 in LA and 22.0+/-4.7, P<0.05 in OA) in the laparoscopic appendectomy group. Operative time was significantly shorter (54.9+/-14.7 in LA and 13.6+/-12.6 minutes in OA) in the open group. Total number of complications was less in the laparoscopic group; however, there was no statistically significant difference.
conclusionThe laparoscopic technique is a safe and clinically beneficial operative procedure. It provides certain advantages over open appendectomy, including short hospital stay, decreased requirement of postoperative analgesia, early food tolerance, and earlier return to normal activities. Where feasible, laparoscopy should be undertaken as the initial procedure of choice for most cases of suspected appendicitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.