Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20202354›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2010

Factors associated with immunisation coverage and timeliness in New Zealand.

Cameron C Grant, Nikki M Turner, Deon G York, Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Helen A Petousis-Harris

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of Age Appropriate Measles Immunisation among the Eligible Children in India: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Family Health Survey-5.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cameron C GrantDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. cc.grant@auckland.ac.nz
Nikki M Turner
Deon G York
Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Helen A Petousis-Harris

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunisation coverage in New Zealand is lower than what is necessary to prevent large epidemics of pertussis. Primary care is where most immunisation delivery occurs. General practices vary in their structure and organisation, both in a general sense and specifically with respect to immunisation delivery.

aimTo identify the structural and organisational characteristics of general practices associated with higher immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery. DESIGN OF STUDY: A random sample of practices during 2005 and 2006.

settingGeneral practices in the Auckland and Midland regions, with over-sampling of indigenous Maori governance practices.

methodPractice immunisation coverage and timeliness were measured. Primary care practice characteristics relevant to immunisation delivery by the practice were described. Associations of these practice characteristics with higher practice immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery were determined.

resultsA total of 124 (61%) of 205 eligible practices were recruited. A median (25th to 75th centile) of 71% (57-77%) of registered children at each practice were fully immunised, and 56% (40-64%) had no immunisation delay. In multivariate analyses, both practice immunisation coverage (P<0.001) and timeliness (P<0.001) decreased with increased social deprivation. After adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation, region, and governance, immunisation coverage and timeliness were better at practices that enrolled children at a younger age (coverage: P = 0.002; timeliness P = 0.007), used one of the four available practice management systems (coverage: P<0.001; timeliness: P = 0.006), and had no staff shortages (coverage: P = 0.027; timeliness: P = 0.021).

conclusionPractice immunisation coverage and timeliness vary widely in New Zealand. General organisational and structural aspects of general practices are key determinants of general practice immunisation delivery.

Indexed as

ImmunizationChild, PreschoolDelivery of Health CareEpidemiologic MethodsFamily PracticeHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInfant, NewbornNew ZealandWhooping Cough

Identifiers

PMID20202354
PMCPMC2828859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.