ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2010
Diagnostic accuracy of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay: a pilot study from India.
Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay as a rapid, sensitive and inexpensive test for detection of tuberculosis and multidrug resistant tuberculosis.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2019Article
- A Microfluidic Channel Method for Rapid Drug-Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.PloS one · 2016Article
- Early and efficient detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by microscopic observation of broth cultures.PloS one · 2013Article
- Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory.Journal of negative results in biomedicine · 2011Article
- Reliability of the MODS assay decentralisation process in three health regions in Peru.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2011Article
- Concurrent evaluation of microscopic observation of drug susceptibility assay for pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis.Journal of laboratory physiciansArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
settingThe microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay is a rapid, sensitive, low-cost liquid culture technique.
objectiveTo establish the accuracy of MODS for the detection of active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), and to document the costs and challenges of setting up this assay in a low-income setting.
designProspective blinded pilot study of 200 adult TB suspects at a tertiary referral hospital in India. Reference standard included culture (Löwenstein-Jensen and automated liquid culture) and clinical diagnosis.
resultsPatients were mostly male (n = 122, 61.1%) and out-patients (n = 184, 92.0%), with a mean age of 40.4 years (standard deviation 16.2). Seventeen (8.5%) were human immunodeficiency virus infected and 47 (23.5%) were reference culture-positive. Compared to reference culture, MODS was 78.9% sensitive (95%CI 62.2-90.0) and 96.7% specific (95%CI 92.0-98.8). Clinical assessment suggested that MODS was false-negative in 3/8 reference culture-positive MODS-negatives and true-positive in 4/6 reference culture-negative MODS-positives. MODS was faster than solid (P < 0.001) and liquid culture (P = 0.088), and cheaper than both.
conclusionMODS may be a good alternative to automated liquid culture, but there were several challenges in setting up the assay. Prior training and validation, setup costs and inability to rule out cross-contamination need to be taken into account before the test can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20202307PMC2951990W125610133What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.