Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20202307›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2010

Diagnostic accuracy of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay: a pilot study from India.

J S Michael, P Daley, S Kalaiselvan, A Latha, J Vijayakumar, D Mathai, K R John, M Pai

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reliability of the MODS assay decentralisation process in three health regions in Peru.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2011
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S MichaelDepartment of Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. joysarojini@hotmail.com
P Daley
S Kalaiselvan
A Latha
J Vijayakumar
D Mathai
K R John
M Pai
Christian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

CIHR 89918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThe microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay is a rapid, sensitive, low-cost liquid culture technique.

objectiveTo establish the accuracy of MODS for the detection of active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), and to document the costs and challenges of setting up this assay in a low-income setting.

designProspective blinded pilot study of 200 adult TB suspects at a tertiary referral hospital in India. Reference standard included culture (Löwenstein-Jensen and automated liquid culture) and clinical diagnosis.

resultsPatients were mostly male (n = 122, 61.1%) and out-patients (n = 184, 92.0%), with a mean age of 40.4 years (standard deviation 16.2). Seventeen (8.5%) were human immunodeficiency virus infected and 47 (23.5%) were reference culture-positive. Compared to reference culture, MODS was 78.9% sensitive (95%CI 62.2-90.0) and 96.7% specific (95%CI 92.0-98.8). Clinical assessment suggested that MODS was false-negative in 3/8 reference culture-positive MODS-negatives and true-positive in 4/6 reference culture-negative MODS-positives. MODS was faster than solid (P < 0.001) and liquid culture (P = 0.088), and cheaper than both.

conclusionMODS may be a good alternative to automated liquid culture, but there were several challenges in setting up the assay. Prior training and validation, setup costs and inability to rule out cross-contamination need to be taken into account before the test can be established.

Indexed as

MicroscopyAdultFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansIndiaMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID20202307
PMCPMC2951990
OpenAlexW125610133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.