Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20202187›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2010

Scientometric analysis of the world-wide research efforts concerning Leishmaniasis.

K Al-Mutawakel, C Scutaru, A Shami, M Sakr, D A Groneberg, D Quarcoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Needlestick injuries: a density-equalizing mapping and socioeconomic analysis of the global research.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacterial meningitis: a density-equalizing mapping analysis of the global research architecture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Leishmaniasis: new insights from an old and neglected disease.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K Al-MutawakelDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Sana'a University Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Sana'a, Yemen. dr.khaled15@yahoo.com.
C Scutaru
A Shami
M Sakr
D A Groneberg
D Quarcoo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstract

backgroundLeishmaniasis is a chronic disease that is found in various countries of the world. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of leishmaniasis on the world's research output. The present study assessed benchmarking of research output for the period between 1957 and 2006. Using large database analyses, research in the field of leishmaniasis was evaluated. Furthermore, cooperation between different countries was identified.

resultsThe number of publications increased with time. Most publications came from Western countries such as the US, UK or Germany. Interestingly, countries like Brazil and India had a high research output. We found a substantial amount of cooperation between countries.

conclusionAlthough leishmaniasis is of limited geographic distribution it attracts a wide research interest. The central hub of research cooperation is the USA.

Identifiers

PMID20202187
PMCPMC2845575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.