Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20201486›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2010

Folding-based electrochemical biosensors: the case for responsive nucleic acid architectures.

Arica A Lubin, Kevin W Plaxco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Modular DNA origami-based electrochemical detection of DNA and proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arica A LubinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.
Kevin W Plaxco

Funding

Rapid detection of diagnostic chemokinesR01AI076899 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Bio-Optical Composites for Rapid Analyte DetectionR01EB002046 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2003 to 2011
$1.6M
Electrochemical arrays for the detection of small molecule drugsR01EB007689 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
Bio-Optical Composites for Rapid Analyte DetectionR01GM062958 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PLAXCO, KEVIN W. · 2001 to 2002
$428k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076899NIBIB NIH HHS 2R01EB002046NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002046NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007689NIGMS NIH HHS GM062958-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular recognition is versatile, specific, and high affinity, qualities that have motivated decades of research aimed at adapting biomolecules into a general platform for molecular sensing. Despite significant effort, however, so-called "biosensors" have almost entirely failed to achieve their potential as reagentless, real-time analytical devices; the only quantitative, reagentless biosensor to achieve commercial success so far is the home glucose monitor, employed by millions of diabetics. The fundamental stumbling block that has precluded more widespread success of biosensors is the failure of most biomolecules to produce an easily measured signal upon target binding. Antibodies, for example, do not change their shape or dynamics when they bind their recognition partners, nor do they emit light or electrons upon binding. It has thus proven difficult to transduce biomolecular binding events into a measurable output signal, particularly one that is not readily spoofed by the binding of any of the many potentially interfering species in typical biological samples. Analytical approaches based on biomolecular recognition are therefore mostly cumbersome, multistep processes relying on analyte separation and isolation (such as Western blots, ELISA, and other immunochemical methods); these techniques have proven enormously useful, but are limited almost exclusively to laboratory settings. In this Account, we describe how we have refined a potentially general solution to the problem of signal detection in biosensors, one that is based on the binding-induced "folding" of electrode-bound DNA probes. That is, we have developed a broad new class of biosensors that employ electrochemistry to monitor binding-induced changes in the rigidity of a redox-tagged probe DNA that has been site-specifically attached to an interrogating electrode. These folding-based sensors, which have been generalized to a wide range of specific protein, nucleic acid, and small-molecule targets, are rapid (responding in seconds to minutes), sensitive (detecting sub-picomolar to micromolar concentrations), and reagentless. They are also greater than 99% reusable, are supported on micrometer-scale electrodes, and are readily fabricated into densely packed sensor arrays. Finally, and critically, their signaling is linked to a binding-specific change in the physics of the probe DNA, and not simply to adsorption of the target onto the sensor head. Accordingly, they are selective enough to be employed directly in blood, crude soil extracts, cell lysates, and other grossly contaminated clinical and environmental samples. Indeed, we have recently demonstrated the ability to quantitatively monitor a specific small molecule in real-time directly in microliters of flowing, unmodified blood serum. Because of their sensitivity, substantial background suppression, and operational convenience, these folding-based biosensors appear potentially well suited for electronic, on-chip applications in pathogen detection, proteomics, metabolomics, and drug discovery.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesAptamers, NucleotideDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ProbesElectrochemical TechniquesElectrodesOxidation-ReductionAptamers, NucleotideDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID20201486
PMCPMC2948786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.