Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20200655›Full record

ArticleGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2010

Evidence and consensus-based German guidelines for the management of analgesia, sedation and delirium in intensive care--short version.

Jörg Martin, Anja Heymann, Katrin Bäsell, Ralf Baron, Rolf Biniek, Hartmut Bürkle, Peter Dall, Christine Dictus, Verena Eggers, Ingolf Eichler and 32 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03572257 phase2 / phase3withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Quetiapine as a Treatment for Delirium in Critically Ill Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2019 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsDeliriumArmsQuetiapine, Placebo
NCT04018989 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Validation of the FOUR Coma Scale in Russia. - a Prospective Observational Multi-center Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorRussian Federation of Anesthesiologists and ReanimatologistsRan2019 to 2019Enrolled260ConditionsStroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit.Current anesthesiology reports · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Jörg MartinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen, Germany.
Anja Heymann
Katrin Bäsell
Ralf Baron
Rolf Biniek
Hartmut Bürkle
Peter Dall
Christine Dictus
Verena Eggers
Ingolf Eichler
Lothar Engelmann
Lars Garten
Wolfgang Hartl
Ulrike Haase
Ralf Huth
Paul Kessler
Stefan Kleinschmidt
Wolfgang Koppert
Franz-Josef Kretz
Heinz Laubenthal
Guenter Marggraf
Andreas Meiser
Edmund Neugebauer
Ulrike Neuhaus
Christian Putensen
Michael Quintel
Alexander Reske
Bernard Roth
Jens Scholz
Stefan Schröder
Dierk Schreiter
Jürgen Schüttler
Gerhard Schwarzmann
Robert Stingele
Peter Tonner
Philip Tränkle
Rolf Detlef Treede
Tomislav Trupkovic
Michael Tryba
Frank Wappler
Christian Waydhas
Claudia Spies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted monitoring of analgesia, sedation and delirium, as well as their appropriate management in critically ill patients is a standard of care in intensive care medicine. With the undisputed advantages of goal-oriented therapy established, there was a need to develop our own guidelines on analgesia and sedation in intensive care in Germany and these were published as 2(nd) Generation Guidelines in 2005. Through the dissemination of these guidelines in 2006, use of monitoring was shown to have improved from 8 to 51% and the use of protocol-based approaches increased to 46% (from 21%). Between 2006-2009, the existing guidelines from the DGAI (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin) and DIVI (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) were developed into 3(rd) Generation Guidelines for the securing and optimization of quality of analgesia, sedation and delirium management in the intensive care unit (ICU). In collaboration with another 10 professional societies, the literature has been reviewed using the criteria of the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine. Using data from 671 reference works, text, diagrams and recommendations were drawn up. In the recommendations, Grade "A" (very strong recommendation), Grade "B" (strong recommendation) and Grade "0" (open recommendation) were agreed. As a result of this process we now have an interdisciplinary and consensus-based set of 3(rd) Generation Guidelines that take into account all critically illness patient populations. The use of protocols for analgesia, sedation and treatment of delirium are repeatedly demonstrated. These guidelines offer treatment recommendations for the ICU team. The implementation of scores and protocols into routine ICU practice is necessary for their success.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAnalgesiaCritical CareCritical IllnessDeliriumEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansProcedural Sedationanalgesiadeliriumevidenceguidelineintensive caremonitoringsedationtreatment

Identifiers

PMID20200655
PMCPMC2830566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.