Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20200537›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2010

PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond.

Michèle Rouleau, Anand Patel, Michael J Hendzel, Scott H Kaufmann, Guy G Poirier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 716 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
716citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

716 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

656 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michèle RouleauLaval University Medical Research Center, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Anand Patel
Michael J Hendzel
Scott H Kaufmann
Guy G Poirier

Funding

Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCOTT H KAUFMANN · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Predoctoral Training Program in Molecular PharmacologyT32GM072474 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNITZ, LARRY M · 2005 to 2020
$2.4M
CIHR IG1-14052CIHR MOP-74648NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393-01NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM072474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent findings have thrust poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) into the limelight as potential chemotherapeutic targets. To provide a framework for understanding these recent observations, we review what is known about the structures and functions of the family of PARP enzymes, and then outline a series of questions that should be addressed to guide the rational development of PARP inhibitors as anticancer agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell DeathDacarbazineDeoxycytidineDNA DamageDNA, NeoplasmGemcitabineHumansKineticsMiceNeoplasmsPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesSubstrate SpecificityAntineoplastic AgentsDacarbazineDeoxycytidineDNA, NeoplasmGemcitabinePARP1 protein, humanPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID20200537
PMCPMC2910902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.