Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20200515›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2010

Nuclear receptors, inflammation, and liver disease: insights for cholestatic and fatty liver diseases.

M Arrese, S J Karpen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Triggering and resolution of inflammation in NASH.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nuclear Receptors as Therapeutic Targets in Liver Disease: Are We There Yet?Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2016
    Review
  13. Biological functions of thyroid hormone in placenta.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M ArreseDepartment of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
S J Karpen
Baylor College of Medicine · USPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

MOLECULAR REGULATION OF HEPATIC TRANSPORTERSR01DK056239 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KARPEN, SAUL J. · 1999 to 2017
$4.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK56239NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors are players of substantial relevance in the regulation of hepatic gene expression. NRs direct normal physiology and metabolism, adaptations to liver disease, and responses to inflammation and toxins.They also contribute to the regenerative response. In this review, we summarize currently available experimental and clinical data, focusing on the role of NRs in cholestasis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We also highlight the potential of NRs as targets for safe and effective therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCholestasisDrug Delivery SystemsFatty LiverHumansInflammationReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID20200515
PMCPMC4120751
OpenAlexW2025681009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.