Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20200382›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2010

Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.

Daniel De Backer, Patrick Biston, Jacques Devriendt, Christian Madl, Didier Chochrad, Cesar Aldecoa, Alexandre Brasseur, Pierre Defrance, Philippe Gottignies, Jean-Louis Vincent and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 568 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
568citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
88.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00314704 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine as the First Vasopressor Agent in the Management of Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorSepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill PatientsRan2003 to 2007Enrolled1,679ConditionsShockArmsdopamine versus norepinephrine
NCT02703038 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

French Observatory on the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in 2016

TypeobservationalSponsorFrench Cardiology SocietyRan2016 to 2018Enrolled777ConditionsShock, Cardiogenic
NCT07562932 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessing Catecholamine Treatment Initiation Options: Norepinephrine vs Dopamine for Cardiogenic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorChonnam National University HospitalRan2026 to 2032Enrolled512ConditionsCardiogenic ShockArmsNorepinephrine, Dopamine Agent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

568 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,879 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

508 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel De BackerDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. ddebacke@ulb.ac.be
Patrick Biston
Jacques Devriendt
Christian Madl
Didier Chochrad
Cesar Aldecoa
Alexandre Brasseur
Pierre Defrance
Philippe Gottignies
Jean-Louis Vincent
SOAP II Investigators
Grand Charleroi Hospital · BEMie University Hospital · JPUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BECentre hospitalier Etterbeek-Ixelles · BEErasmus Hospital · BEHospital Universitario Río Hortega · ESMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth dopamine and norepinephrine are recommended as first-line vasopressor agents in the treatment of shock. There is a continuing controversy about whether one agent is superior to the other.

methodsIn this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with shock to receive either dopamine or norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor therapy to restore and maintain blood pressure. When blood pressure could not be maintained with a dose of 20 microg per kilogram of body weight per minute for dopamine or a dose of 0.19 microg per kilogram per minute for norepinephrine, open-label norepinephrine, epinephrine, or vasopressin could be added. The primary outcome was the rate of death at 28 days after randomization; secondary end points included the number of days without need for organ support and the occurrence of adverse events.

resultsThe trial included 1679 patients, of whom 858 were assigned to dopamine and 821 to norepinephrine. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death at 28 days (52.5% in the dopamine group and 48.5% in the norepinephrine group; odds ratio with dopamine, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.42; P=0.10). However, there were more arrhythmic events among the patients treated with dopamine than among those treated with norepinephrine (207 events [24.1%] vs. 102 events [12.4%], P<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed that dopamine, as compared with norepinephrine, was associated with an increased rate of death at 28 days among the 280 patients with cardiogenic shock but not among the 1044 patients with septic shock or the 263 with hypovolemic shock (P=0.03 for cardiogenic shock, P=0.19 for septic shock, and P=0.84 for hypovolemic shock, in Kaplan-Meier analyses).

conclusionsAlthough there was no significant difference in the rate of death between patients with shock who were treated with dopamine as the first-line vasopressor agent and those who were treated with norepinephrine, the use of dopamine was associated with a greater number of adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00314704.)

Indexed as

AgedArrhythmias, CardiacCombined Modality TherapyDopamineFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineShockVasoconstrictor AgentsDopamineNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID20200382
OpenAlexW2095944485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.