Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20200257›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2010

Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body fat accretion in overweight or obese children.

Natalie M Racine, Abigail C Watras, Aaron L Carrel, David B Allen, Jennifer J McVean, Robert R Clark, Abigail R O'Brien, Marianne O'Shea, Corey E Scott, Dale A Schoeller

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Cow's milk fat and child adiposity: a prospective cohort study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Daily Intake of ParaprobioticMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie M RacineDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Abigail C Watras
Aaron L Carrel
David B Allen
Jennifer J McVean
Robert R Clark
Abigail R O'Brien
Marianne O'Shea
Corey E Scott
Dale A Schoeller
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCRR NIH HHS RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a supplemental dietary fatty acid that decreases fat mass accretion in young animals.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine CLA's efficacy with regard to change in fat and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)) in children.

designWe conducted a 7 +/- 0.5-mo randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of CLA in 62 prepubertal children aged 6-10 y who were overweight or obese but otherwise healthy. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive 3 g/d of 80% CLA (50:50 cis-9,trans-11 and trans-10,cis-12 isomers) or placebo in chocolate milk.

resultsFifty-three subjects completed the trial (n = 28 in the CLA group, n = 25 in the placebo group). CLA attenuated the increase in BMI (0.5 +/- 0.8) compared with placebo (1.1 +/- 1.1) (P = 0.05). The percentage change in body fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was smaller (P = 0.001) in the CLA group (-0.5 +/- 2.1%) than in the placebo group (1.3 +/- 1.8%). The change in abdominal body fat as a percentage of total body weight was smaller (P = 0.02) in the CLA group (-0.09 +/- 0.9%) than in the placebo group (0.43 +/- 0.6%). There were no significant changes in plasma glucose, insulin, or LDL cholesterol between groups. Plasma HDL cholesterol decreased significantly more (P = 0.05) in the CLA group (-5.1 +/- 7.3 mg/dL) than in the placebo group (-0.7 +/- 8 mg/dL). Bone mineral accretion was lower (P = 0.04) in the CLA group (0.05 +/- 0.03 kg) than in the placebo group (0.07 +/- 0.03 kg). Reported gastrointestinal symptoms did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionsCLA supplementation for 7 +/- 0.5 mo decreased body fatness in 6-10-y-old children who were overweight or obese but did not improve plasma lipids or glucose and decreased HDL more than in the placebo group. Long-term investigation of the safety and efficacy of CLA supplementation in children is recommended.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdipose TissueBody CompositionBody HeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightBone DensityChildFemaleHumansLinoleic Acids, ConjugatedLipoproteins, HDLMaleObesityOverweightPatient SelectionLinoleic Acids, ConjugatedLipoproteins, HDLPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID20200257
PMCPMC2854896
OpenAlexW2118206276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.