Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20200027›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2010

Acellular pertussis vaccination facilitates Bordetella parapertussis infection in a rodent model of bordetellosis.

Gráinne H Long, Alexia T Karanikas, Eric T Harvill, Andrew F Read, Peter J Hudson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pertussis vaccines, epidemiology and evolution.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Molecular epidemiology and genomic features ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Evolution and Conservation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Widespread Bordetella parapertussis Infections-Wisconsin, 2011-2012: Clinical and Epidemiologic Features and Antibiotic Use for Treatment and Prevention.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Within-host dynamics of infection: from ecological insights to evolutionary predictions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gráinne H LongCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. g.long@sheffield.ac.uk
Alexia T Karanikas
Eric T Harvill
Andrew F Read
Peter J Hudson
Pennsylvania State University · USCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · US

Funding

Evolution of the Bordetellae from Commensals to PathogensR01GM083113 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HARVILL, ERIC T · 2008 to 2011
$2.1M
Comparative Immunobiology of the bordetellaeR01AI053075 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI HARVILL, ERIC T. · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI053075NIGMS NIH HHS GM083113NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite over 50 years of population-wide vaccination, whooping cough incidence is on the rise. Although Bordetella pertussis is considered the main causative agent of whooping cough in humans, Bordetella parapertussis infections are not uncommon. The widely used acellular whooping cough vaccines (aP) are comprised solely of B. pertussis antigens that hold little or no efficacy against B. parapertussis. Here, we ask how aP vaccination affects competitive interactions between Bordetella species within co-infected rodent hosts and thus the aP-driven strength and direction of in-host selection. We show that aP vaccination helped clear B. pertussis but resulted in an approximately 40-fold increase in B. parapertussis lung colony-forming units (CFUs). Such vaccine-mediated facilitation of B. parapertussis did not arise as a result of competitive release; B. parapertussis CFUs were higher in aP-relative to sham-vaccinated hosts regardless of whether infections were single or mixed. Further, we show that aP vaccination impedes host immunity against B. parapertussis-measured as reduced lung inflammatory and neutrophil responses. Thus, we conclude that aP vaccination interferes with the optimal clearance of B. parapertussis and enhances the performance of this pathogen. Our data raise the possibility that widespread aP vaccination can create hosts more susceptible to B. parapertussis infection.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesPertussis VaccineAnimalsBordetella InfectionsBordetella parapertussisColony Count, MicrobialDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLVaccinationWhooping CoughDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesPertussis Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID20200027
PMCPMC2880100
OpenAlexW2142575951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.