Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20199954›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

Comparison of injection drug users accessing syringes from pharmacies, syringe exchange programs, and other syringe sources to inform targeted HIV prevention and intervention strategies.

Abby E Rudolph, Natalie D Crawford, Danielle C Ompad, Ebele O Benjamin, Rachel J Stern, Crystal M Fuller

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Attitudes toward pharmacy-based HCV/HIV testing among people who use drugs in rural Kentucky.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Needle exchange and the geography of survival in the South Bronx.The International journal on drug policy · 2012
    Article
  19. Pharmacists and harm reduction: A review of current practices and attitudes.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Abby E RudolphBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Natalie D Crawford
Danielle C Ompad
Ebele O Benjamin
Rachel J Stern
Crystal M Fuller
Columbia University · USNew York Academy of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The HIV Risk Behavior and the Urban EnvironmentR01DA018061 · NIDA · NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE · PI VLAHOV, DAVID · 2005 to 2009
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA018061NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe injection drug users (IDUs) who access syringes through different outlets to help inform the prevention needs of IDUs who underuse safe syringe sources in New York City (NYC), where syringe availability is high compared with other U.S. cities.

designCross sectional.

settingNYC, 2005-2007.

participants285 IDUs.

interventionParticipants were recruited using random street-intercept sampling in 36 socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods.

main outcome measuresIDUs using syringe exchange programs (SEPs), pharmacies, or other outlets as a primary syringe source were compared based on sociodemographic characteristics, injection practices, and medical service use.

resultsChi-square tests and polytomous logistic regression were used to compare IDUs with different self-reported primary syringe sources used in the 6 months preceding study entry. Compared with IDUs using other syringe sources, those primarily using SEPs were less likely to be black (adjusted odds ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.11-0.57]), more likely to inject daily (3.32 [1.58-6.98]), and more likely to inject with a new syringe (2.68 [1.30-5.54]). Compared with IDUs using other syringe sources, those primarily using pharmacies were less likely to be black (0.39 [0.17-0.90]).

conclusionThese data suggest that pharmacies and SEPs may be reaching different populations of IDUs and highlight a subpopulation of highly marginalized IDUs (i.e., black race, infrequent injectors) who are underusing safe syringe sources in NYC. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce racial disparities and increase use of safe syringe outlets.

Indexed as

Needle-Exchange ProgramsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdultChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeedle SharingNew York CityPharmaciesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20199954
PMCPMC3222463
OpenAlexW2007040095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.