Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20199680›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2010

The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening.

Caroline S Dorfman, Randi M Williams, Elisabeth C Kassan, Sara N Red, David L Dawson, William Tuong, Elizabeth R Parker, Janet Ohene-Frempong, Kimberly M Davis, Alexander H Krist and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00623090 (Internet-Based Education for Prostate Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00623090 phase3completednot on this map

Internet-Based Education for Prostate Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2007 to 2011Enrolled1,893ConditionsProstate CancerArmseducational internet site on prostate cancer screening, Educational print booklet, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Baseline Attitudes About Prostate Cancer Screening Moderate the Impact of Decision Aids on Screening Rates.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Shared decision making and patient decision aids: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Hawai'i physicians.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caroline S DorfmanDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007-2401, USA.
Randi M Williams
Elisabeth C Kassan
Sara N Red
David L Dawson
William Tuong
Elizabeth R Parker
Janet Ohene-Frempong
Kimberly M Davis
Alexander H Krist
Steven H Woolf
Marc D Schwartz
Mary B Fishman
Carmella Cole
Kathryn L Taylor

Funding

Internet-Based Education for Prostate Cancer ScreeningR01CA119168 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, KATHRYN L · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R0I CA119168-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether early detection and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) will reduce disease-related mortality remains uncertain. As a result, tools are needed to facilitate informed decision making. While there have been several decision aids (DAs) developed and tested, very few have included an exercise to help men clarify their values and preferences about PCa screening. Further, only one DA has utilized an interactive web-based format, which allows for an expansion and customization of the material. We describe the development of two DAs, a booklet and an interactive website, each with a values clarification component and designed for use in diverse settings.

methodsWe conducted two feasibility studies to assess men's (45-70 years) Internet access and their willingness to use a web- vs. a print-based tool. The booklet was adapted from two previous versions evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the website was created to closely match the content of the revised booklet. Usability testing was conducted to obtain feedback regarding draft versions of the materials. The tools were also reviewed by a plain language expert and the interdisciplinary research team. Feedback on the content and presentation led to iterative modifications of the tools.

resultsThe feasibility studies confirmed that the Internet was a viable medium, as the majority of men used a computer, had access to the Internet, and Internet use increased over time. Feedback from the usability testing on the length, presentation, and content of the materials was incorporated into the final versions of the booklet and website. Both the feasibility studies and the usability testing highlighted the need to address men's informed decision making regarding screening.

conclusionsInformed decision making for PCa screening is crucial at present and may be important for some time, particularly if a definitive recommendation either for or against screening does not emerge from ongoing prostate cancer screening trials. We have detailed our efforts at developing print- and web-based DAs to assist men in determining how to best meet their PCa screening preferences. Following completion of our ongoing RCT designed to test these materials, our goal will be to develop a dissemination project for the more effective tool.

trial registrationNCT00623090.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalInternetAgedComprehensionEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID20199680
PMCPMC2845091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.