Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2010
The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening.
Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00623090 (Internet-Based Education for Prostate Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Internet-Based Education for Prostate Cancer Screening
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- Videos to influence: a systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Inclusion of underserved racial and ethnic groups in cancer intervention research using new media: a systematic literature review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Trial
- Trial
- A comparison of web-based versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Trial
- Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2013Trial
- Fostering informed decisions: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a decision aid among men registered to undergo mass screening for prostate cancer.Patient education and counseling · 2013Trial
- The Impact of Video-Based Educational Interventions on Cervical Cancer, Pap Smear and HPV Vaccines.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Translation and cultural adaptation of a prostate cancer screening decision aid: a qualitative study in Portugal.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Article
- Policymaker experiences with rapid response briefs to address health-system and technology questions in Uganda.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Development and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience.Internet interventions · 2015Article
- Baseline Attitudes About Prostate Cancer Screening Moderate the Impact of Decision Aids on Screening Rates.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2015Article
- Decision aids that support decisions about prenatal testing for Down syndrome: an environmental scan.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Decisional outcomes following use of an interactive web-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening.Translational behavioral medicine · 2015Article
- Development and validation of a personalized, web-based decision aid for lung cancer screening using mixed methods: a study protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2014Article
- Overdetection in breast cancer screening: development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid.BMJ open · 2014Article
- Shared decision making and patient decision aids: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Hawai'i physicians.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether early detection and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) will reduce disease-related mortality remains uncertain. As a result, tools are needed to facilitate informed decision making. While there have been several decision aids (DAs) developed and tested, very few have included an exercise to help men clarify their values and preferences about PCa screening. Further, only one DA has utilized an interactive web-based format, which allows for an expansion and customization of the material. We describe the development of two DAs, a booklet and an interactive website, each with a values clarification component and designed for use in diverse settings.
methodsWe conducted two feasibility studies to assess men's (45-70 years) Internet access and their willingness to use a web- vs. a print-based tool. The booklet was adapted from two previous versions evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the website was created to closely match the content of the revised booklet. Usability testing was conducted to obtain feedback regarding draft versions of the materials. The tools were also reviewed by a plain language expert and the interdisciplinary research team. Feedback on the content and presentation led to iterative modifications of the tools.
resultsThe feasibility studies confirmed that the Internet was a viable medium, as the majority of men used a computer, had access to the Internet, and Internet use increased over time. Feedback from the usability testing on the length, presentation, and content of the materials was incorporated into the final versions of the booklet and website. Both the feasibility studies and the usability testing highlighted the need to address men's informed decision making regarding screening.
conclusionsInformed decision making for PCa screening is crucial at present and may be important for some time, particularly if a definitive recommendation either for or against screening does not emerge from ongoing prostate cancer screening trials. We have detailed our efforts at developing print- and web-based DAs to assist men in determining how to best meet their PCa screening preferences. Following completion of our ongoing RCT designed to test these materials, our goal will be to develop a dissemination project for the more effective tool.
trial registrationNCT00623090.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.