Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20199347›Full record

ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2010

The need for serum biomarker development for diagnosing and excluding tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Andrew W Horne, W Colin Duncan, Hilary Od Critchley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Study of Risk factors and treatment modalities of ectopic pregnancy.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021
    Article
  4. Clinical audit of ectopic pregnancy.Electronic physician · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy.The journal of family planning and reproductive health care · 2011
    Article
  13. Laboratory models for studying ectopic pregnancy.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2011
    Review
  14. Normally rising hCG does not predict live birth in women presenting with pain and bleeding in early pregnancy.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew W HorneCentre for Reproductive Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. andrew.horne@ed.ac.uk
W Colin Duncan
Hilary Od Critchley

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/513Chief Scientist Office SCD/02Medical Research Council G0802808Medical Research Council G0802808(90914)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, TubalBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20199347
PMCPMC2971461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.