ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2010
Growth patterns of abdominal atherosclerotic calcified deposits from lumbar lateral X-rays.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominal aortic calcification, bone mineral density and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Distribution, size, shape, growth potential and extent of abdominal aortic calcified deposits predict mortality in postmenopausal women.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate new methods for describing the progression of atherosclerosis based on novel information of the growth patterns of individual abdominal aortic calcifications (AACs) over time. Lateral X-ray images were used due to their low cost, fast examination time, and wide-spread use, which facilitates a large statistical model (n > 100) based on longitudinal data. The examined cohort consisted of 103 post-menopausal women aged 62.4 years (± 7.0 years) with an average number of AACs of (4.7 ± 8.0) at baseline. The subjects had X-ray images taken in 1992-1993 (baseline) and again in 2000-2001 (follow-up). The growth patterns of the individual AACs were derived based on registered baseline and follow-up images. Area, height, width, centre of mass position, and movement of the centre of mass, and upper and lower boundary of the matched AACs were measured. The AACs occurred first, mainly, on the posterior aortic wall. The AACs grew on average 41 in the longitudinal direction and 21 in the radial direction. A correlation of 0.48 (P < 0.001) between growth in width and height of the AACs was present. The centre of mass of the AACs moved 0.60 mm (P < 0.001) downstream in the aorta, on average. The growth patterns of AACs may give new insights into the progression of atherosclerosis. The downstream asymmetry in the growth patterns indicates variability in microscopic environments around the AACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.