Efficiency and specificity of CTXphi chromosomal integration: dif makes all the difference.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparative Genomics Revealed Wide Intra-Species Genetic Heterogeneity and Lineage-Specific Genes ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
   Article
2. Interactions of Bacteriophages with Animal and Human Organisms-Safety Issues in the Light of Phage Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Review
3. Vibrio Pathogenicity Island-1: The Master Determinant of Cholera Pathogenesis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
   Review
4. Occurrence in Mexico, 1998-2008, of Vibrio cholerae CTX+ El Tor carrying an additional truncated CTX prophage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
   Article
5. Mobile effector proteins on phage genomes.Bacteriophage · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Molecular keys of the tropism of integration of the cholera toxin phage.2010

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as