Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20196651›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2010

Detection of a substantial rate of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in an HIV-infected population in South Africa by active monitoring of sputum samples.

Shaheen Hassim, Pamela A Shaw, Phumelele Sangweni, Lizette Malan, Ella Ntshani, Monkwe Jethro Mathibedi, Nomso Stubbs, Julia A Metcalf, Risa Eckes, Henry Masur and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improved survival in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients receiving integrated tuberculosis and antiretroviral treatment in the SAPiT Trial.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical role of rapid C-reactive protein testing in HIV-infected individuals with presumed tuberculosis in South Africa.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaheen HassimSouth African National Defence Force, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Pamela A Shaw
Phumelele Sangweni
Lizette Malan
Ella Ntshani
Monkwe Jethro Mathibedi
Nomso Stubbs
Julia A Metcalf
Risa Eckes
Henry Masur
Stephanus Komati
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Study Of Antiretroviral Pharmacokinetics In Patients FroZ01CL001170 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MASUR, HENRY · 2001 to 2008
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CL001170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a substantial problem in South Africa. There has been a presumption that drug-resistant strains of TB are common in South Africa, but few studies have documented this impression.

methodsIn Phidisa, a joint observational and randomized HIV treatment study for South African National Defence Force members and dependents, an initiative was launched to test subjects (by use of microbiologic TB test) who appeared to be at high risk. We report results for HIV-infected subjects.

resultsTB was identified by culture in 116 (19.9%) of 584 patients selected for sputum examination on the basis of suggestive symptoms. Smear was an insensitive technique for confirming the diagnosis: only 33% of culture-positive patients were identified by smear, with a 0.2% false-positive rate. Of the 107 culture-positive individuals with susceptibility testing, 22 (20.6%) were identified to be multidrug resistant (MDR), and 4 (3.7%) were identified to be extensively drug resistant. Culture-positive cases with a history of TB treatment had more than twice the rate of MDR than those without (27.1% vs 11.9%; P = .05).

conclusionsTB is common in this cohort of HIV-infected patients. Smear was not a sensitive technique for identifying culture-positive cases in this health system. Drug susceptibility testing is essential to proper patient management because MDR was present in 20.6% of culture-positive patients. Better management strategies are needed to reduce the development of MDR TB, because so many of these patients had received prior antituberculous therapy that was presumably not curative.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySouth AfricaSputum

Identifiers

PMID20196651
PMCPMC2947351
OpenAlexW2156347964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.