Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20196619›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2010

Binding of MetJ repressor to specific and nonspecific DNA and effect of S-adenosylmethionine on these interactions.

Anne M Augustus, Harvey Sage, Leonard D Spicer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne M AugustusDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Harvey Sage
Leonard D Spicer
Duke University · US

Funding

Heteronuclear Multi-dimensional In-Cell NMR SpectroscopyR21RR022854 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SPICER, LEONARD D · 2008 to 2010
$583k
NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR022854NCRR NIH HHS RR-022854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used analytical ultracentrifugation to characterize the binding of the methionine repressor protein, MetJ, to synthetic oligonucleotides containing zero to five specific recognition sites, called metboxes. For all lengths of DNA studied, MetJ binds more tightly to repeats of the consensus sequence than to naturally occurring metboxes, which exhibit a variable number of deviations from the consensus. Strong cooperative binding occurs only in the presence of two or more tandem metboxes, which facilitate protein-protein contacts between adjacent MetJ dimers, but weak affinity is detected even with DNA containing zero or one metbox. The affinity of MetJ for all of the DNA sequences studied is enhanced by the addition of SAM, the known cofactor for MetJ in the cell. This effect extends to oligos containing zero or one metbox, both of which bind two MetJ dimers. In the presence of a large excess concentration of metbox DNA, the effect of cooperativity is to favor populations of DNA oligos bound by two or more MetJ dimers rather than a stochastic redistribution of the repressor onto all available metboxes. These results illustrate the dynamic range of binding affinity and repressor assembly that MetJ can exhibit with DNA and the effect of the corepressor SAM on binding to both specific and nonspecific DNA.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBase SequenceConsensus SequenceDimerizationDNAFractionation, Field FlowKineticsMethionineMolecular WeightOligodeoxyribonucleotidesProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsS-AdenosylmethionineUltracentrifugationBacterial ProteinsDNAMethioninemethionine repressor protein, BacteriaOligodeoxyribonucleotidesRepressor ProteinsS-Adenosylmethionine

Identifiers

PMID20196619
PMCPMC2891263
OpenAlexW2142488223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.