Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20195593›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2010

Characterization of rhesus macaque KIR genotypes and haplotypes.

Philip H Kruse, Cornelia Rosner, Lutz Walter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MHC Class I Ligands of Rhesus Macaque Killer Cell Ig-like Receptors.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip H KrusePrimate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Cornelia Rosner
Lutz Walter
German Primate Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain combinations of the killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and major histocompatibility complex class I ligands in humans predispose carriers to a variety of diseases, requiring sophisticated genotyping of the highly polymorphic and diverse KIR and HLA genes. Particularly, KIR genotyping is challenging due to polymorphisms (allelic substitutions), genomic diversity (presence/absence of genes), and frequent duplications. Rhesus macaques are often used as important animal models of human diseases such as, e.g. AIDS. However, typing of rhesus macaque KIR genes has not been described so far. In this study, we report the identification of additional novel rhesus macaque KIR cDNA sequences and a sequence-specific KIR genotyping assay. From a cohort of four rhesus macaque families with a total of 70 individuals, we identified 25 distinct KIR genotypes. Segregation analyses of KIR genes and of two polymorphic microsatellite markers allowed the identification of 21 distinct KIR haplotypes in these families, with five to 11 segregating KIR genes per haplotype. Our analyses confirmed and extended knowledge on differential gene KIR gene content in macaques and indicate that rhesus macaque and human KIR haplotypes show a comparable level of diversity and complexity.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsGenotypeHaplotypesHumansMacaca mulattaMolecular Sequence DataReceptors, KIRSequence AlignmentReceptors, KIR

Identifiers

PMID20195593
OpenAlexW2024104286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.