Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20195588›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2010

A pilot study to evaluate a community pharmacy-based monitoring system to identify adverse drug reactions associated with paediatric medicines use.

Mansour Tobaiqy, Derek Stewart, Peter J Helms, Christine Bond, Amanda Jane Lee, Nick Bateman, Dorothy McCaig, James McLay

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mansour TobaiqyDivision of Applied Health Sciences, The Aberdeen Medical School, The University of Aberdeen, Abeerden, UK. m.tobaiqy@abdn.ac.uk
Derek Stewart
Peter J Helms
Christine Bond
Amanda Jane Lee
Nick Bateman
Dorothy McCaig
James McLay
University of Aberdeen · GBRobert Gordon University · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZG/2/267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent pharmacovigilance systems are limited by spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), lack of a denominator, and lower than expected reporting rates. The aim of our study was to undertake a formal pilot evaluation of a community pharmacy-led ADR monitoring system.

methodsThe setting was community pharmacies in five Health Boards areas of Scotland. Subjects were parents, guardians, or children presenting prescriptions for children 16 years and under prescribed serotonin specific reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), anticonvulsants, or medicines for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). All pharmacies (n = 827) were invited to participate. Over a 3-month period they were asked to identify prescriptions for targeted medicines and give out an ADR questionnaire. Questionnaire content included child demography, duration of medicine use, indication, perceived ADRs, and their description and severity. The study was approved by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee.

resultsSeventy-two community pharmacists (8.7%) agreed to take part. Two hundred and twenty-nine questionnaires were distributed and 55 (24%) completed and returned by parents. Forty-one questionnaires related to ADHD medications, 13 to anticonvulsants, and 1 to an SSRI. Thirty questionnaires reported 44 possible ADRs, 19 of which were related to methylphenidate.

conclusionsThe proposed ADR monitoring system identified expected ADRs thus demonstrating face and content validity for our approach. However the process was limited by low community pharmacist participation rates and low questionnaire return rates.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnticonvulsantsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMelatoninMethylphenidatePharmaciesPilot ProjectsPropylaminesAnticonvulsantsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideMelatoninMethylphenidatePropylaminesSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20195588
OpenAlexW1971937138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.