Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20195501›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags.

Paul A Hohenlohe, Susan Bassham, Paul D Etter, Nicholas Stiffler, Eric A Johnson, William A Cresko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 562 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
562citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

562 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High-quality genome ofPlant diversity · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

502 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul A HohenloheCenter for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Susan Bassham
Paul D Etter
Nicholas Stiffler
Eric A Johnson
William A Cresko

Funding

Rapid and cost-efficient genotyping tools for stuides of threespine sticklebackR24GM079486 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI CRESKO, WILLIAM A · 2007 to 2010
$708k
Mechanisms of dermoskeletal development in fishF32GM078949 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BASSHAM, SUSAN LEE · 2007 to 2008
$112k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R24GM079486-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM078949NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM079486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing technology provides novel opportunities for gathering genome-scale sequence data in natural populations, laying the empirical foundation for the evolving field of population genomics. Here we conducted a genome scan of nucleotide diversity and differentiation in natural populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We used Illumina-sequenced RAD tags to identify and type over 45,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each of 100 individuals from two oceanic and three freshwater populations. Overall estimates of genetic diversity and differentiation among populations confirm the biogeographic hypothesis that large panmictic oceanic populations have repeatedly given rise to phenotypically divergent freshwater populations. Genomic regions exhibiting signatures of both balancing and divergent selection were remarkably consistent across multiple, independently derived populations, indicating that replicate parallel phenotypic evolution in stickleback may be occurring through extensive, parallel genetic evolution at a genome-wide scale. Some of these genomic regions co-localize with previously identified QTL for stickleback phenotypic variation identified using laboratory mapping crosses. In addition, we have identified several novel regions showing parallel differentiation across independent populations. Annotation of these regions revealed numerous genes that are candidates for stickleback phenotypic evolution and will form the basis of future genetic analyses in this and other organisms. This study represents the first high-density SNP-based genome scan of genetic diversity and differentiation for populations of threespine stickleback in the wild. These data illustrate the complementary nature of laboratory crosses and population genomic scans by confirming the adaptive significance of previously identified genomic regions, elucidating the particular evolutionary and demographic history of such regions in natural populations, and identifying new genomic regions and candidate genes of evolutionary significance.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceDNAFresh WaterGene FrequencyGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationGenomeGeographyMetagenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsRestriction MappingSeawaterDNA

Identifiers

PMID20195501
PMCPMC2829049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.