Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20195253›Full record

ReviewNature methods2010

Visualization of multiple alignments, phylogenies and gene family evolution.

James B Procter, Julie Thompson, Ivica Letunic, Chris Creevey, Fabrice Jossinet, Geoffrey J Barton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetic Analysis of Natural Variation inFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Visualizing time-related data in biology, a review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James B ProcterUniversity of Dundee, UK. j.procter@dundee.ac.uk
Julie Thompson
Ivica Letunic
Chris Creevey
Fabrice Jossinet
Geoffrey J Barton

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G022682/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Software for visualizing sequence alignments and trees are essential tools for life scientists. In this review, we describe the major features and capabilities of a selection of stand-alone and web-based applications useful when investigating the function and evolution of a gene family. These range from simple viewers, to systems that provide sophisticated editing and analysis functions. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges that these tools now face due to the flood of next generation sequence data and the increasingly complex network of bioinformatics information sources.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMultigene FamilyPhylogenySequence AlignmentAmino Acid SequenceInternetMolecular Sequence DataProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteins

Identifiers

PMID20195253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.