Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20194625›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010

SDOP-DB: a comparative standardized-protocol database for mouse phenotypic analyses.

Nobuhiko Tanaka, Kazunori Waki, Hideki Kaneda, Tomohiro Suzuki, Ikuko Yamada, Tamio Furuse, Kimio Kobayashi, Hiromi Motegi, Hideaki Toki, Maki Inoue and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Principles and application of LIMS in mouse clinics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Review
  2. Accessing data from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: state of the art and future plans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nobuhiko TanakaTechnology and Development Unit for Knowledge Base of Mouse Phenotype, RIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba 305-0074, Japan.
Kazunori Waki
Hideki Kaneda
Tomohiro Suzuki
Ikuko Yamada
Tamio Furuse
Kimio Kobayashi
Hiromi Motegi
Hideaki Toki
Maki Inoue
Osamu Minowa
Tetsuo Noda
Keizo Takao
Tsuyoshi Miyakawa
Aki Takahashi
Tsuyoshi Koide
Shigeharu Wakana
Hiroshi Masuya

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThis article reports the development of SDOP-DB, which can provide definite, detailed and easy comparison of experimental protocols used in mouse phenotypic analyses among institutes or laboratories. Because SDOP-DB is fully compliant with international standards, it can act as a practical foundation for international sharing and integration of mouse phenotypic information. AVAILABILITY: SDOP-DB (http://www.brc.riken.jp/lab/bpmp/SDOP/).

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMicePhenotypeSoftwareAnimalsGenomicsInternetUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID20194625
PMCPMC2853689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.