Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20194237›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2010

Systematic review: Vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes.

Anastassios G Pittas, Mei Chung, Thomas Trikalinos, Joanna Mitri, Michael Brendel, Kamal Patel, Alice H Lichtenstein, Joseph Lau, Ethan M Balk

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 276 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
60.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 744 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Vitamin D and VDR in Gynecological Cancers-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anastassios G PittasTufts Medical Center and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, and Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Mei Chung
Thomas Trikalinos
Joanna Mitri
Michael Brendel
Kamal Patel
Alice H Lichtenstein
Joseph Lau
Ethan M Balk
Tufts University · US

Funding

Vitamin D and Calcium Homeostasis in Relation to Type 2 DiabetesR01DK076092 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PITTAS, ANASTASSIOS G · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Vitamin D Status in Relation to Incident Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiometabolic RiskR01DK079003 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PITTAS, ANASTASSIOS G · 2008 to 2010
$957k
Vitamin D Status and Incident Type 2 DiabetesR21DK078867 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PITTAS, ANASTASSIOS G · 2007 to 2008
$500k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076092NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079003NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK76092NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK79003NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK078867NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK78867PHS HHS 290-2007-10055-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D may modify risk for cardiometabolic outcomes (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease). PURPOSE: To examine the association between vitamin D status, including the effect of vitamin D supplementation, and cardiometabolic outcomes in generally healthy adults. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies in MEDLINE (inception to 4 November 2009) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (fourth quarter of 2009). STUDY SELECTION: 11 reviewers screened citations to identify longitudinal cohort studies that reported associations between vitamin D status and cardiometabolic outcomes, including randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation. DATA EXTRACTION: 5 independent reviewers extracted data about study conduct, participant characteristics, outcomes, and quality. Differences were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: 13 observational studies (14 cohorts) and 18 trials were eligible. Three of 6 analyses (from 4 different cohorts) reported a lower incident diabetes risk in the highest versus the lowest vitamin D status groups. Eight trials found no effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemia or incident diabetes. In meta-analysis of 3 cohorts, lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was associated with incident hypertension (relative risk, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4]). In meta-analyses of 10 trials, supplementation nonsignificantly reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, -1.9 mm Hg [CI, -4.2 to 0.4 mm Hg]) and did not affect diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, -0.1 mm Hg [CI, -0.7 to 0.5 mm Hg]). Lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was associated with incident cardiovascular disease in 5 of 7 analyses (6 cohorts). Four trials found no effect of supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Studies included primarily white participants. Observational studies were heterogeneous. Several trials reported post hoc analyses.

conclusionThe association between vitamin D status and cardiometabolic outcomes is uncertain. Trials showed no clinically significant effect of vitamin D supplementation at the dosages given. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and Public Health Agency of Canada.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypertensionLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID20194237
PMCPMC3211092
OpenAlexW2079789436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.