Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20194141›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2010

The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas.

R L Carhart-Harris, K J Friston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Me, myself, bye: regional alterations in glutamate and the experience of ego dissolution with psilocybin.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  6. Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R L Carhart-HarrisNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK. r.carhart-harris@imperial.ac.uk
K J Friston

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores the notion that Freudian constructs may have neurobiological substrates. Specifically, we propose that Freud's descriptions of the primary and secondary processes are consistent with self-organized activity in hierarchical cortical systems and that his descriptions of the ego are consistent with the functions of the default-mode and its reciprocal exchanges with subordinate brain systems. This neurobiological account rests on a view of the brain as a hierarchical inference or Helmholtz machine. In this view, large-scale intrinsic networks occupy supraordinate levels of hierarchical brain systems that try to optimize their representation of the sensorium. This optimization has been formulated as minimizing a free-energy; a process that is formally similar to the treatment of energy in Freudian formulations. We substantiate this synthesis by showing that Freud's descriptions of the primary process are consistent with the phenomenology and neurophysiology of rapid eye movement sleep, the early and acute psychotic state, the aura of temporal lobe epilepsy and hallucinogenic drug states.

Indexed as

EgoFreudian TheoryAnimalsBrainBrain MappingCognitionHumansMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID20194141
PMCPMC2850580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.