Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20193068›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Mathematical model for empirically optimizing large scale production of soluble protein domains.

Eisuke Chikayama, Atsushi Kurotani, Takanori Tanaka, Takashi Yabuki, Satoshi Miyazaki, Shigeyuki Yokoyama, Yutaka Kuroda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DisMeta: a meta server for construct design and optimization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eisuke ChikayamaGenomic Sciences Center RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan. chika@psc.riken.jp
Atsushi Kurotani
Takanori Tanaka
Takashi Yabuki
Satoshi Miyazaki
Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Yutaka Kuroda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficient dissection of large proteins into their structural domains is critical for high throughput proteome analysis. So far, no study has focused on mathematically modeling a protein dissection protocol in terms of a production system. Here, we report a mathematical model for empirically optimizing the cost of large-scale domain production in proteomics research.

resultsThe model computes the expected number of successfully producing soluble domains, using a conditional probability between domain and boundary identification. Typical values for the model's parameters were estimated using the experimental results for identifying soluble domains from the 2,032 Kazusa HUGE protein sequences. Among the 215 fragments corresponding to the 24 domains that were expressed correctly, 111, corresponding to 18 domains, were soluble. Our model indicates that, under the conditions used in our pilot experiment, the probability of correctly predicting the existence of a domain was 81% (175/215) and that of predicting its boundary was 63% (111/175). Under these conditions, the most cost/effort-effective production of soluble domains was to prepare one to seven fragments per predicted domain.

conclusionsOur mathematical modeling of protein dissection protocols indicates that the optimum number of fragments tested per domain is actually much smaller than expected a priori. The application range of our model is not limited to protein dissection, and it can be utilized for designing various large-scale mutational analyses or screening libraries.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalDatabases, ProteinProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryProteomeProteomicsProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID20193068
PMCPMC2843616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.