Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20192562›Full record

ReviewPsychological bulletin2010

The disclosure processes model: understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity.

Stephenie R Chaudoir, Jeffrey D Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological bulletin, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 241 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Disclosure of Mental Health Problems or Suicidality at Work: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephenie R ChaudoirDepartment of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 61625, USA. schaudoir@bradley.edu
Jeffrey D Fisher

Funding

Changing ART Adherence BehaviorR01MH066684 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI FISHER, JEFFREY D · 2003 to 2006
$5.4M
HIV/AIDS Disclosure Decision-Making and OutcomesF31MH080651 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI CHAUDOIR, STEPHENIE R · 2007 to 2009
$91k
NIMH NIH HHS 1F31MH080651NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH066684NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH080651NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disclosure is a critical aspect of the experience of people who live with concealable stigmatized identities. This article presents the disclosure processes model (DPM)-a framework with which to examine when and why interpersonal disclosure may be beneficial. The DPM suggests that antecedent goals representing approach and avoidance motivational systems moderate the effect of disclosure on numerous individual, dyadic, and social contextual outcomes and that these effects are mediated by three distinct processes: (a) alleviation of inhibition, (b) social support, and (c) changes in social information. Ultimately, the DPM provides a framework that advances disclosure theory and identifies strategies that can assist disclosers in maximizing the likelihood that disclosure will benefit well-being.

Indexed as

Decision MakingIdentification, PsychologicalPsychological TheorySelf DisclosureStereotypingComprehensionGoalsHumansInhibition, PsychologicalSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID20192562
PMCPMC2922991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.