Trial reportJournal of the National Medical Association2010
Recruitment of rural physicians in a diabetes internet intervention study: overcoming challenges and barriers.
Trial report in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00403091 (Internet Intervention to Improve Rural Diabetes Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Internet Intervention to Improve Rural Diabetes Care
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Examining uptake of online education on obstructive sleep apnoea in general practitioners: a randomised trial.BMC research notes · 2016Trial
- A web-based diabetes intervention for physician: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2011Trial
- The design and rationale of a multicenter real-world trial: The Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control in the US Black Belt - Addressing the Triple Threat.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Quality of diabetes mellitus care by rural primary care physicians.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2012Article
- Medication intensification in diabetes in rural primary care: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial.BMJ open · 2012Article
- Patient complexity and diabetes quality of care in rural settings.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis paper highlights a descriptive study of the challenges and lessons learned in the recruitment of rural primary care physicians into a randomized clinical trial using an Internet-based approach.
methodsA multidisciplinary/multi-institutional research team used a multilayered recruitment approach, including generalized mailings and personalized strategies such as personal office visits, letters, and faxes to specific contacts. Continuous assessment of recruitment strategies was used throughout study in order to readjust strategies that were not successful.
resultsWe recruited 205 primary care physicians from 11 states. The 205 lead physicians who enrolled in the study were randomized, and the overall recruitment yield was 1.8% (205/11231). In addition, 8 physicians from the same practices participated and 12 nonphysicians participated. The earlier participants logged on to the study Web site, the greater yield of participation. Most of the study participants had logged on within 10 weeks of the study.
conclusionDespite successful recruitment, the 2 major challenges in recruitment in this study included defining a standardized definition of rurality and the high cost of chart abstractions. Because many of the patients of study recruits were African American, the potential implications of this study on the field of health disparities in diabetes are important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.