Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20191661›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2010

Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature.

Jürgen Rehm, Ulrich Frick

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Disability associated with alcohol abuse and dependence.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Burden of disease associated with alcohol use disorders in the United States.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Establishing disability weights from pairwise comparisons for a US burden of disease study.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2013
    Review
  13. Using surveys to calculate disability-adjusted life-years.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Alcohol-attributable burden of disease and injury in Canada, 2004.International journal of public health · 2012
    Article
  17. Social relationships as a major determinant in the valuation of health states.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jürgen RehmCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jtrehm@aol.com
Ulrich Frick

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200700041C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metric of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) has become the global standard of measuring burden of disease. DALYs are comprised of years of life lost due to premature mortality and years of healthy life lost due to living with disability. In order to calculate the second part of the DALY equation, disease specific disability weights have to be established, i.e. measures for the decline of health associated with these disease states, which vary between zero for perfect health and one for death. Although these disability weights are key for estimating DALYs, there have not been many comprehensive studies with empirical determinations of them. This article describes a systematic review on the state of the art with respect to empirically determining disability weights. Based on this review, a multi-method approach is outlined, which has also been implemented in a US study to measure burden of disease. This approach involves the use of psychometric methodology as well as economic trade-off methods for determining the value of health states. It is conceptualized as a disaggregated approach, where the disability weight of any health state can be calculated if the attributes of this health state are known. The US study received the collaboration of experts from more than 20 institutes of the National Institutes of Health and of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. First results will be available by the end of this year.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHealth StatusQuality-Adjusted Life YearsHumansNational Health ProgramsPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20191661
PMCPMC3306052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.