Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20191474›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2010

Work participation and health status in early osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee: a comparison between the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee and the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

H J Bieleman, F G J Oosterveld, J C M Oostveen, M F Reneman, J W Groothoff

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

H J BielemanSaxion Universities of Applied Sciences, Enschede, and University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. h.j.bieleman@saxion.nl
F G J Oosterveld
J C M Oostveen
M F Reneman
J W Groothoff
Saxion University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

ZINC THERAPY FOR SCLERODERMA--PHASE I STUDYM01RR002719 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EARLEY, CHRISTOPHER J · 1986 to 2007
$20.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR002719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the work participation of Dutch people with early osteoarthritis (OA) in hips or knees and compare this with data from the American Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort. The influence of health status and personal factors on work participation was analyzed.

methodsIn the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study, 1,002 subjects were included. Baseline questionnaire data from 970 subjects were analyzed. Rate ratios were calculated to compare work participation with the general Dutch population, after correcting (by stratifying) for age, sex, and education. Health status was measured using the Short Form 36 health survey and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Groups were compared (CHECK versus OAI, workers versus nonworkers) using t-tests.

resultsThe mean age of the subjects was 56 years and 79% were women. Overall participation was 51%, similar to the general Dutch population and lower than in the OAI (76%). Point prevalence of sick leave because of hip/knee symptoms was 2%, and year prevalence was 12%. Of the subjects, 14% had made work adaptations. Workers reported significantly better health status (corrected for age, sex, and education) than nonworkers.

conclusionWork participation of Dutch people with early OA is similar to the general population and significantly lower than American subjects. Increasing age, female sex, and lower education level were related to lower participation. Societal factors appear to have had more effect on work participation than health status in this stage of OA. The better health status of workers could not be explained solely by selection bias, but may be a result of work.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, Knee

Identifiers

PMID20191474
PMCPMC3005361
OpenAlexW1999556728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.