Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20191373›Full record

ArticleInvertebrate neuroscience : IN2009

A review of FMRFamide- and RFamide-like peptides in metazoa.

Robert J Walker, Sylvana Papaioannou, Lindy Holden-Dye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Invertebrate neuroscience : IN, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Short neuropeptide F in integrated insect physiology.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. FMRF-NHThe Journal of comparative neurology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. An FMRFamide Neuropeptide in CuttlefishMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J WalkerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sylvana Papaioannou
Lindy Holden-Dye
University of Southampton · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropeptides are a diverse class of signalling molecules that are widely employed as neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in animals, both invertebrate and vertebrate. However, despite their fundamental importance to animal physiology and behaviour, they are much less well understood than the small molecule neurotransmitters. The neuropeptides are classified into families according to similarities in their peptide sequence; and on this basis, the FMRFamide and RFamide-like peptides, first discovered in molluscs, are an example of a family that is conserved throughout the animal phyla. In this review, the literature on these neuropeptides has been consolidated with a particular emphasis on allowing a comparison between data sets in phyla as diverse as coelenterates and mammals. The intention is that this focus on the structure and functional aspects of FMRFamide and RFamide-like neuropeptides will inform understanding of conserved principles and distinct properties of signalling across the animal phyla.

Indexed as

FMRFamideNeuropeptidesAnimalsLysophospholipids1-O-(9',10'-methanohexadecanoyl)-sn-glycero-2,3-cyclic phosphateFMRFamideLysophospholipidsNeuropeptidesRFamide peptide

Identifiers

PMID20191373
OpenAlexW2151733775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.