Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20191268›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2010

Evolution of repeated sequences in the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer of 32 arthropod species.

Cheryl D Ambrose, Teresa J Crease

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheryl D AmbroseDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
Teresa J Crease
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of a multigene family (MGF) is affected by the structure and function of its regulatory elements, specifically by the link between recombination and DNA transcription and/or replication. The ribosomal DNA (rDNA) MGF is often hierarchically repetitive, combining function with repetition in a single genic system. Its tandemly repeated operons contain the transcription unit of the 45S ribosomal RNA precursor alternating with an intergenic spacer (IGS) that commonly includes repeated transcription regulatory elements. To study the evolution of repeated sequences and the influence of repeat characteristics on their sequence divergence, we sequenced and characterized a single complete IGS from 11 daphniid species and analyzed their repeat arrays along with those from an additional 21 species of arthropods. We tested the hypotheses that sequence similarity is higher among tandemly arrayed repeats than among interleaved or dispersed repeats, and that the homogeneity of repeat arrays is affected by the number and the length of repeats, as well as by the presence of putative regulatory elements. We found that both tandem repeat organization and the presence of a TATA motif are significantly correlated with increased sequence similarity among homologous IGS repeats. We also observed that some repeat types are only found in a single species, while others appear to have persisted for >100 MY, with evidence for homologous repeat types in sister species. Taken together, these data suggest that both drift and natural selection influence repeat evolution within the IGS.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsArthropodsChironomidaeCloning, MolecularDaphniaDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerDrosophilaGenetic SpeciationPhylogenySpecies SpecificityDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID20191268
OpenAlexW2031988850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.