ArticleKorean journal of radiology
Use of self-expanding stents for the treatment of vertebral artery ostial stenosis: a single center experience.
Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recanalization of symptomatic vertebral ostial occlusion in patients with acute or subacute stroke.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2014Trial
- Long-term biomechanical stability of self-expanding stents using the crossover technique for vertebral artery ostium stenosis: A tortuosity index analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Vertebrobasilar Artery Stent Placement.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Endovascular Treatment for Posterior Circulation Stroke: Ways to Maximize Therapeutic Efficacy.Journal of stroke · 2022Review
- Stent fracture and occlusion after treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery ostium stenosis with a self-expanding device. A case report.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2014Article
- Endovascular treatment of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis.World journal of radiology · 2012Article
- Self-expanding open-cell carotid stent for symptomatic moderate-to-severe vertebral artery origin atherosclerotic stenosis: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyReview
- Endovascular treatment of in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery ostial stenting: incidence, risks and outcomes.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate our early experience using self-expanding stents to treat atherosclerotic vertebral artery ostial stenosis (VAOS), with respect to technical feasibility and clinical and imaging follow-up results. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 20 lesions in 20 patients underwent stenting of the VAOS using a self-expanding stent (Precise RX; Cordis Neurovascular, Miami Lakes, FL). Two patients were asymptomatic. We analyzed the technical success rate, causes of technical failure, occurrence of any vascular or neurological event, and the occurrence of any neurological abnormality or in-stent restenosis (ISR) seen on follow-up. The imaging follow-up was performed with Doppler ultrasound (DUS) as a primary screening modality.
resultsOne instance of technical failure was caused by failure of the guidewire passage. The stent diameter was 5 mm, and post-stenting balloon dilatations were necessary in all cases. Stent misplacement requiring placement of an additional stent occurred in four cases. Following a 14.8 month average clinical follow-up time, two patients showed anterior circulation ischemia, which was not attributed to the VAOS we treated. Following a 13.7 month average DUS follow-up, five patients showed a mild degree of diffuse or focal intimal thickening in the stent lumen; however, none of the stenosis showed luminal loss of more than 50% and no stent fracture was noted.
conclusionThe use of self-expanding stents for treating VAOS was technically feasible and helped to improve artery patency during our limited follow-up interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.