Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20190880›Full record

ReviewIEEE reviews in biomedical engineering2008

Screening the cellular microenvironment: a role for microfluidics.

Jay W Warrick, William L Murphy, David J Beebe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The cellular microenvironment and cytoskeletal actin dynamics in liver fibrogenesis.Biocell : official journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopia Electronica ... et. al · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jay W WarrickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1609, USA.
William L Murphy
David J Beebe

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Study of Progenitor Regulation in Mouse Mammary GlandK25CA104162 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2004 to 2008
$751k
Biomaterials for sequential growth factor deliveryR03AR052893 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM L. · 2006 to 2008
$300k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA104162NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR052893NIAMS NIH HHS R03AR052893NLM NIH HHS 5T15LM007359NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular microenvironment is an increasingly discussed topic in cell biology as it has been implicated in the progression of cancer and the maintenance of stem cells. The microenvironment of a cell is an organized combination of extracellular matrix (ECM), cells, and interstitial fluid that influence cellular phenotype through physical, mechanical, and biochemical mechanisms. Screening can be used to map combinations of cells and microenvironments to phenotypic outcomes in a way that can help develop more predictive in vitro models and to better understand phenotypic mechanisms from a systems biology perspective. This paper examines microenvironmental screening in terms of outcomes and benefits, key elements of the screening process, challenges for implementation, and a possible role for microfluidics as the screening platform. To assess microfluidics for use in microenvironmental screening, examples and categories of micro-scale and microfluidic technology are highlighted. Microfluidic technology shows promise for simultaneous control of multiple parameters of the microenvironment and can provide a base for scaling advanced cell-based experiments into automated high-throughput formats.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesSystems BiologyCell biologycell culturechallengesextracellular matrixin vitro modelsmicrochannelmicroenvironmentsmicrofluidicsmultitiered high-throughput screeningoptimizationparameter spacephenotypesplatformssoluble factorsstem cells

Identifiers

PMID20190880
PMCPMC2829441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.