ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010
Information technology and the role of WMDA in promoting standards for international exchange of hematopoietic stem cell donors and products.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- "30 years of global collaboration in transplantation and cellular therapy: WMDA's commitment to donor safety, ethical standards, and equitable access".Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Review
- Article
- Computer algorithms in the search for unrelated stem cell donors.Bone marrow research · 2012Article
- The Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry: Providing Patients in Austria with Unrelated Donors for Transplant - a Worldwide Cooperation.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2011Article
- World Marrow Donor Association framework for the implementation of HLA matching programs in hematopoietic stem cell donor registries and cord blood banks.Bone marrow transplantation · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nearly half of the unrelated hematopoietic SCTs facilitated worldwide involves an exchange of products between countries. The process is information intensive and requires coordination through regional hubs of complex data transactions of demographic, clinical and genetic information, laboratory samples and results. Each registry has developed its own unique systems for representing data and process leading to transplantation. The WMDA Information Technology Working Group was formed in the autumn of 2001 as a forum to discuss and develop standards for information technology (IT) in support of hematopoietic stem cell registries. Its membership includes experts in IT from the WMDA member registries. The group has focused its standardization efforts on three areas: Standardized reference data sets for validation and plausibility controls for HLA and other data domains. Matching algorithm standards for determining histocompatibility. Communication standards between registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20190838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.