Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20190835›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010

Quality rather than quantity: the cord blood bank dilemma.

S Querol, S G Gomez, A Pagliuca, M Torrabadella, J A Madrigal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05836974 (Performance Evaluation of the ex Utero Cord Blood Collection Technique), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05836974 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Performance Evaluation of the ex Utero Cord Blood Collection Technique: Procedure, Quality and Results

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion DexeusRan2023 to 2024Enrolled133ConditionsUmbilical Cord BloodArmsEx-utero cord blood collection, In-utero cord blood collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Grade Regulatory CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in cord blood banking.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S QuerolThe Anthony Nolan Research Institute, The Anthony Nolan Trust, London, UK.
S G Gomez
A Pagliuca
M Torrabadella
J A Madrigal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing inventories of cord blood units have facilitated access to umbilical cord cell transplantation for many patients lacking conventional stem cell donors. They are in principle 'off-the-shelf', 'fit-for-use', as well as safe and effective therapy products. Cellular enumeration is used as a surrogate of graft potency, and users rely on the rigorous assessment carried out in banks to avoid poor engraftment after thawing (loss of cells or poor function), when the patient's situation is critical. However, in practice, when units are selected, initially on the basis of HLA matching and cell dose assessment, their absolute quality remains uncertain. Unfortunately, quality-related issues (particularly related to viability) are not uncommon in cord blood transplantation. The reasons for potency failures are diverse, but a lack of thorough validation during critical steps of the process and of appropriate use of quality-control tools for timely detection of problematic units are significant contributors. Moreover, incongruence between different sets of standards and regulations, and lack of common quality systems between banks result in a highly heterogeneous international inventory. Therefore, this complicates the matter for the end user of the product. To ameliorate this situation, it is essential to improve quality at each of the critical manufacturing steps wherein potency can be threatened, thereby creating homogeneous inventories of units with excellent quality and quantity.

Indexed as

Fetal BloodBlood BankingBlood BanksBlood PreservationCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationHumansQuality Control

Identifiers

PMID20190835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.