Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20190064›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel).

Walter Palmas, Steven Shea, Justin Starren, Jeanne A Teresi, Michael L Ganz, Tanya M Burton, Chris L Pashos, Jan Blustein, Lesley Field, Philip C Morin and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Methods of Reimbursement for Telemedicine Services: A Scoping Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The empirical evidence for the telemedicine intervention in diabetes management.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Design and customization of telemedicine systems.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Walter PalmasDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York 10032, USA. wp56@columbia.edu
Steven Shea
Justin Starren
Jeanne A Teresi
Michael L Ganz
Tanya M Burton
Chris L Pashos
Jan Blustein
Lesley Field
Philip C Morin
Roberto E Izquierdo
Stephanie Silver
Joseph P Eimicke
Rafael A Lantigua
Ruth S Weinstock
IDEATel Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To determine whether a diabetes case management telemedicine intervention reduced healthcare expenditures, as measured by Medicare claims, and to assess the costs of developing and implementing the telemedicine intervention. Design We studied 1665 participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel), a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management of diabetes to usual care. Participants were aged 55 years or older, and resided in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. Measurements We analyzed Medicare claims payments for each participant for up to 60 study months from date of randomization, until their death, or until December 31, 2006 (whichever happened first). We also analyzed study expenditures for the telemedicine intervention over six budget years (February 28, 2000- February 27, 2006). Results Mean annual Medicare payments (SE) were similar in the usual care and telemedicine groups, $9040 ($386) and $9669 ($443) per participant, respectively (p>0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including stratification by censored status, adjustment by enrollment site, and semi-parametric weighting by probability of dropping-out, rendered similar results. Over six budget years 28 821 participant/months of telemedicine intervention were delivered, at an estimated cost of $622 per participant/month. Conclusion Telemedicine case management was not associated with a reduction in Medicare claims in this medically underserved population. The cost of implementing the telemedicine intervention was high, largely representing special purpose hardware and software costs required at the time. Lower implementation costs will need to be achieved using lower cost technology in order for telemedicine case management to be more widely used.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsMedically Underserved AreaAgedCase ManagementCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth ServicesHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedNew YorkTelemedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20190064
PMCPMC3000788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.