Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20189991›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Use of venom peptides to probe ion channel structure and function.

Sébastien Dutertre, Richard J Lewis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tangled Tail of Mechanically Interlocked Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. LaIT6: A Novel Insect-Selective KMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Molecular Insights into the Marine GastropodInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. ScrepYard: An online resource for disulfide-stabilized tandem repeat peptides.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sébastien DutertreAtheris Laboratories, CH-1233 Bernex-Geneva, Switzerland.
Richard J Lewis
Atheris Laboratories (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venoms of snakes, scorpions, spiders, insects, sea anemones, and cone snails are complex mixtures of mostly peptides and small proteins that have evolved for prey capture and/or defense. These deadly animals have long fascinated scientists and the public. Early studies isolated lethal components in the search for cures and understanding of their mechanisms of action. Ion channels have emerged as targets for many venom peptides, providing researchers highly selective and potent molecular probes that have proved invaluable in unraveling ion channel structure and function. This minireview highlights molecular details of their toxin-receptor interactions and opportunities for development of peptide therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIon ChannelsPeptide MappingPeptidesProtein ConformationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipVenomsIon ChannelsPeptidesVenoms

Identifiers

PMID20189991
PMCPMC2859489
OpenAlexW2024698360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.