Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20189458›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2010

New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS).

Leo H Bonati, Lisa M Jongen, Sven Haller, H Zwenneke Flach, Joanna Dobson, Paul J Nederkoorn, Sumaira Macdonald, Peter A Gaines, Annet Waaijer, Annet Waajier and 11 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
52.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03303430 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Correlation Between Cerebral Microembolisation and Plaque Characteristics After Carotid Revascularization

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GenevaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsCarotid StenosisArmsMRI
NCT06123767 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Diagnostic and Predictive Capabilities of Novel Application of Carotid Carotid Stenosis Pressure Gradient Measurement in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting (CAS).

TypeinterventionalSponsor4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, PolandRan2024 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsCarotid Artery Stenosis, Carotid Artery Stenting, StrokeArmsCAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradient, CAS (standard), Doppler ultrasonound of cephalic arteries, Angio-CT of the neck and head, Otolaryngological examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 574 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection: A randomized multicenter trial (the CASWEP trial).Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Predictors of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death within 30 Days of Carotid Artery Stenting: Results from the International Carotid Stenting Study.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2016
    Trial
  18. Carotid Anatomy Does Not Predict the Risk of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Carotid Artery Stenting in the ICSS-MRI Substudy.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2016
    Trial
  19. Mechanism of Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting Within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) Randomised Trial.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2015
    Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Leo H BonatiDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lisa M Jongen
Sven Haller
H Zwenneke Flach
Joanna Dobson
Paul J Nederkoorn
Sumaira Macdonald
Peter A Gaines
Annet Waaijer
Annet Waajier
Peter Stierli
H Rolf Jäger
Philippe A Lyrer
L Jaap Kappelle
Stephan G Wetzel
Aad van der Lugt
Willem P Mali
Martin M Brown
H Bart van der Worp
Stefan T Engelter
ICSS-MRI study group
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHErasmus MC · NLNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBAcademic Medical Center · NLFreeman Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNorthern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0300411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) of stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis found a higher incidence of stroke within 30 days of stenting compared with endarterectomy. We aimed to compare the rate of ischaemic brain injury detectable on MRI between the two groups.

methodsPatients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis enrolled in ICSS were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy. Of 50 centres in ICSS, seven took part in the MRI substudy. The protocol specified that MRI was done 1-7 days before treatment, 1-3 days after treatment (post-treatment scan), and 27-33 days after treatment. Scans were analysed by two or three investigators who were masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was the presence of at least one new ischaemic brain lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on the post-treatment scan. Analysis was per protocol. This is a substudy of a registered trial, ISRCTN 25337470.

findings231 patients (124 in the stenting group and 107 in the endarterectomy group) had MRI before and after treatment. 62 (50%) of 124 patients in the stenting group and 18 (17%) of 107 patients in the endarterectomy group had at least one new DWI lesion detected on post-treatment scans done a median of 1 day after treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.21, 95% CI 2.78-9.79; p<0.0001). At 1 month, there were changes on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences in 28 (33%) of 86 patients in the stenting group and six (8%) of 75 in the endarterectomy group (adjusted OR 5.93, 95% CI 2.25-15.62; p=0.0003). In patients treated at a centre with a policy of using cerebral protection devices, 37 (73%) of 51 in the stenting group and eight (17%) of 46 in the endarterectomy group had at least one new DWI lesion on post-treatment scans (adjusted OR 12.20, 95% CI 4.53-32.84), whereas in those treated at a centre with a policy of unprotected stenting, 25 (34%) of 73 patients in the stenting group and ten (16%) of 61 in the endarterectomy group had new lesions on DWI (adjusted OR 2.70, 1.16-6.24; interaction p=0.019).

interpretationAbout three times more patients in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group had new ischaemic lesions on DWI on post-treatment scans. The difference in clinical stroke risk in ICSS is therefore unlikely to have been caused by ascertainment bias. Protection devices did not seem to be effective in preventing cerebral ischaemia during stenting. DWI might serve as a surrogate outcome measure in future trials of carotid interventions.

fundingUK Medical Research Council, the Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union, Netherlands Heart Foundation, and Mach-Gaensslen Foundation.

Indexed as

AgedBrainBrain IschemiaCarotid StenosisDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleFiltrationFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOdds RatioProspective StudiesStentsStrokeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20189458
OpenAlexW2153613626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.