Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20188747›Full record

ReviewMicrovascular research2010

EPCs and pathological angiogenesis: when good cells go bad.

Sergio Li Calzi, Matthew B Neu, Lynn C Shaw, Jennifer L Kielczewski, Nicanor I Moldovan, Maria B Grant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microvascular research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergio Li CalziDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Matthew B Neu
Lynn C Shaw
Jennifer L Kielczewski
Nicanor I Moldovan
Maria B Grant

Funding

NITRIC OXIDE IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHYR01EY012601 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Julia V Busik, Maria Bartolomeo Grant · 1998 to 2026
$9.6M
Targeting the IGF-1 System in Retinal AngiogenesisR01EY007739 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ABCOUWER, STEVEN F, GRANT, MARIA BARTOLOMEO · 1995 to 2015
$5.4M
Vascular Reparative Mechanism by ACE2/Ang-(1-7)in DiabetesR01HL110170 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GRANT, MARIA BARTOLOMEO · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NO Dysregulation of the Peripheral Clock in Diabetic ComplicationsR01DK090730 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GRANT, MARIA BARTOLOMEO · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
CXCR4/SDF-1 Axis in Proliferation Diabetic RetinopathyR21EY014818 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GRANT, MARIA BARTOLOMEO · 2002 to 2003
$725k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007739NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012601NEI NIH HHS R21 EY014818NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL110170NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone-marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) contribute to angiogenesis-mediated pathological neovascularization, and recent studies have begun to recognize the biological significance of this contribution. This review will discuss the ability of EPCs to contribute to neovascularization in both physiological and pathological conditions. Circulating EPCs were originally identified in 1997 by Asahara as CD34(+) VEGFR2(+) mononuclear cells. These cells differentiated into an endothelial phenotype, expressed endothelial markers, and incorporated into neovessels at sites of ischemia (Asahara et al., 1997). EPCs provide both instructive (release of pro-angiogenic cytokines) and structural (vessel incorporation and stabilization) functions that contribute to the initiation of neo-angiogenesis. EPC populations can be characterized based on surface markers of freshly isolated cells, or they can be described by their in vitro characteristics once placed in culture. However, a major stumbling block to progress in the field has been the lack of consensus among investigators as to the optimal characterization of EPCs. This review intends to address the role of both EPC classes and evaluate how they interact in the setting of pathological angiogenesis. Since the EPCs may be responsible for turning on the "angiogenic switch," strategies have been employed to keep this switch in the "off" position for diseases like cancer, retinopathy, and wet AMD. The expectation is that EPCs will evolve into clinically useful prognostic and predictive tools in cancer and in ocular diseases associated with pathological neovascularization and that targeting this cell type is a key to successful management of patients suffering from diseases associated with pathological neovascularization.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationEndothelial CellsHumansNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicPhenotypeRetinal NeovascularizationStem Cell NicheStem CellsAngiogenesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20188747
PMCPMC3650470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.