Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20187947›Full record

Trial reportTrials2010

Rationale and design of the randomised clinical trial comparing early medication change (EMC) strategy with treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with major depressive disorder--the EMC trial.

André Tadić, Stanislav Gorbulev, Norbert Dahmen, Christoph Hiemke, Dieter F Braus, Joachim Röschke, Dietrich van Calker, Daniel Wachtlin, Kai Kronfeld, Thorsten Gorbauch and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00974155 (Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Early Medication Change), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00974155 phase4completednot on this map

Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Early Medication Change (EMC) Strategy With Treatment as Usual (TAU) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder - the EMC Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorK. LiebRan2009 to 2014Enrolled889ConditionsDepressionArmsEscitalopram, venlafaxine, lithium, Escitalopram, venlafaxine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

André TadićDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany. tadic@uni-mainz.de
Stanislav Gorbulev
Norbert Dahmen
Christoph Hiemke
Dieter F Braus
Joachim Röschke
Dietrich van Calker
Daniel Wachtlin
Kai Kronfeld
Thorsten Gorbauch
Monika Seibert-Grafe
Klaus Lieb
EMC Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn major depressive disorder (MDD), the traditional belief of a delayed onset of antidepressants' effects has lead to the concept of current guidelines that treatment durations should be between 3-8 weeks before medication change in case of insufficient outcome. Post hoc analyses of clinical trials, however, have shown that improvement usually occurs within the first 10-14 days of treatment and that such early improvement (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD] decrease >or=20%) has a substantial predictive value for final treatment outcome. Even more important, non-improvement (HAMD decrease <20%) after 14 days of treatment was found to be highly predictive for a poor final treatment outcome. METHODS/

designThe EMC trial is a phase IV, multi-centre, multi-step, randomized, observer-blinded, actively controlled parallel-group clinical trial to investigate for the first time prospectively, whether non-improvers after 14 days of antidepressant treatment with an early medication change (EMC) are more likely to attain remission (HAMD-17 <or=7) on treatment day 56 compared to patients treated according to current guideline recommendation (treatment as usual; TAU). In level 1 of the EMC trial, non-improvers after 14 days of antidepressant treatment will be randomised to an EMC strategy or TAU. The EMC strategy for this study schedules a first medication change on day 15; in case of non-improvement between days 15-28, a second medication change will be performed. TAU schedules the first medication change after 28 days in case of non-response (HAMD-17 decrease <50%). Both interventions will last 42 days. In levels 2 and 3, EMC strategies will be compared with TAU strategies in improvers on day 14, who experience a stagnation of improvement during the course of treatment. The trial is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and will be conducted in cooperation with the BMBF funded Interdisciplinary Centre Clinical Trials (IZKS) at the University Medical Centre Mainz and at six clinical trial sites in Germany. DISCUSSION: If the EMC strategies lead to significantly more remitters, changes of clinical practice, guidelines for the treatment of MDD as well as research settings can be expected.

trial registrationClincaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974155; EudraCT: 2008-008280-96.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesResearch DesignTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20187947
PMCPMC2837649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.