Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20187753›Full record

ArticleFoodborne pathogens and disease2010

Salmonella enterica serotype Cerro among dairy cattle in New York: an emerging pathogen?

Kevin J Cummings, Lorin D Warnick, Mara Elton, Lorraine D Rodriguez-Rivera, Julie D Siler, Emily M Wright, Yrjo T Gröhn, Martin Wiedmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Persistence of non-typhoidalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Sensitivity of dairy calfMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Prolonged Treatment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Rural Raccoons (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Zoonotic potential and prevalence ofInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Monitoring the Microevolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Population Dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin J CummingsDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. kjc39@cornell.edu
Lorin D Warnick
Mara Elton
Lorraine D Rodriguez-Rivera
Julie D Siler
Emily M Wright
Yrjo T Gröhn
Martin Wiedmann

Funding

FOOD &WATERBORNE DISEASES INTEGRATED RESEARCH NETWORK, ZOONOES RESEAR-N01AI030054 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · 2003 to 2003
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-30054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focus of this study was Salmonella enterica serotype Cerro, a potentially emerging pathogen of cattle. Our objectives were to document the within-herd prevalence of Salmonella Cerro among a sample of New York dairy herds, to describe the antimicrobial resistance patterns and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types of the isolates, and to elucidate the status of this serotype as a bovine pathogen. Data were collected prospectively from dairy herds throughout New York that had at least 150 lactating cows and that received clinical service from participating veterinarians. Following enrollment, Salmonella surveillance consisted of both environmental screening and disease monitoring within the herd. Herds positive by either environmental or fecal culture were sampled during three visits to estimate the within-herd prevalence of Salmonella. Among 57 enrolled herds, 44 (77%) yielded Salmonella-positive samples during the study period. Of these, 20 herds (46%) were positive for Salmonella Cerro. Upon follow-up sampling for estimation of prevalence, Cerro was identified in 10 of the 20 herds; the median within-herd Cerro prevalence was 17%, with a maximum of 53%. Antimicrobial resistance ranged from zero to nine drugs, and eight (40%) of the Cerro-positive farms generated drug-resistant isolates. Eight XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types were represented among 116 isolates tested, although 89% of these isolates shared the predominant type. Among herds with clinical cases, cattle that had signs consistent with salmonellosis were more likely to test positive for Cerro than apparently healthy cattle, as estimated by a logistic regression model that controlled for herd as a random effect (odds ratio: 3.9). There is little in the literature concerning Salmonella Cerro, and published reports suggest an absence of disease association in cattle. However, in our region there has been an apparent increase in the prevalence of this serotype among cattle with salmonellosis. Other Salmonella serotypes important to bovine health have emerged to become leading causes of human foodborne disease, and close monitoring of Cerro is warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCattleCattle DiseasesCommunicable Diseases, EmergingDairyingDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnvironmental MicrobiologyFecesLogistic ModelsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNew YorkPopulation SurveillancePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID20187753
PMCPMC3132111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.