Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20187349›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses2010

Understanding recruitment and retention in neurological research.

Alyssa Newberry, Paula Sherwood, Allison Hricik, Sarah Bradley, Jean Kuo, Elizabeth Crago, Leslie A Hoffman, Barbara A Given

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The triple challenge of recruiting older adults with dementia and high medical acuity in skilled nursing facilities.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2013
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Feasibility of implementing an electronic social support and resource visualization tool for caregivers in a neuro-oncology clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alyssa NewberryUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. agn8@pitt.edu
Paula Sherwood
Allison Hricik
Sarah Bradley
Jean Kuo
Elizabeth Crago
Leslie A Hoffman
Barbara A Given
University of Pittsburgh · USCentre for Nursing Innovation · GB

Funding

Role of 20-HETE on Vasospasm-Induced Ischemia after Subarachnoid HemorrhageR01NR004339 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI POLOYAC, SAMUEL M, SHERWOOD, PAULA R · 1999 to 2013
$7.2M
Patient and Health Care System Outcomes Following EEAR01NR011044 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GARDNER, PAUL A., SHERWOOD, PAULA R · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Mind-Body Interactions in Neuro-Oncology Family CaregiversR01CA118711 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHERWOOD, PAULA R · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118711NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 118711001NINR NIH HHS R01 NR004339NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive deficits in participants and the abrupt and traumatic way in which many neurological conditions present are two examples of the unique challenges in recruiting and retaining participants with neurological injury for research studies. The purpose of this investigation was to identify obstacles to recruitment and retention in three ongoing research studies. These studies involve persons with neurological disorders across the continuum of care, from those newly diagnosed and with emergent presentation to those with more established chronic neurological conditions. For this analysis, we evaluated the effectiveness of the strategies employed to improve participation rates. The first study was a project funded by the National Institutes of Health designed to identify biomarkers of vasospasm in persons (n = 496) with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who presented to the neurovascular intensive care unit (National Institute of Nursing Research, R01 NR004339). The purpose of the second study was to examine biobehavioral interactions in family caregivers (n = 59) of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor recruited in the community setting. The third project involved recruiting persons (n = 1,019) within an outpatient neurosurgical center to participate in a research registry. To determine differential effectiveness of strategies, consent and attrition rates were calculated at serial points over time in three studies, and recruitment and retention strategies were compared. Sentinel time points in participants' disease trajectories played a key role in determining whether those who were approached to participate gave consent and were retained, particularly in the studies involving persons with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (consent = 85%; retention = 89%) and persons with primary malignant brain tumors and their caregivers (consent = 68%; retention = 83%). In addition, several specific recruiter and interviewer training techniques were associated with higher recruitment and retention. Targeted strategies to improve participation rates are vital for neuroscience nurses involved in any aspect of clinical research, including those who conduct studies, assist with data collection, and recruit potential participants.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionRegistriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomedical ResearchBrain NeoplasmsCaregiversClinical Nursing ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesOutpatients

Identifiers

PMID20187349
PMCPMC2831228
OpenAlexW2063758933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.